25 March 1995



      RI-123i  'Use of the "Suppressive Person"-concept'



from Ron's Inspector


Message # RI-123i for Internet




The discovery and formulation of the concept
 of "Suppressive Person" or "anti-social personality",
 is a major achievement of Scientology, of L. Ron Hubbard.


These persons have of course always existed,
 but they have never been adequately labeled
 as a general practise which would have been necessary
 and would have prevented the destruction of families,
 groups, cities, states, countries, continents, etc. (and
  this is the only reason why the fair game policy is correct).


Yes, Man is basically good,
 and this even applies to Suppressive Persons, or,
  as we also might call them, anti-social personalities,
 but such a person has completely lost any knowledge or
 even desire to know who he really is.

So, the basis of the person, the goodness,
 lies at the bottom of a 50 billion years old,
 and constantly being used, rubbish dump.


This is not changed by the theories of
 anti-social personalities, such as Allen Hacker (Speaker),
  who proves and states also
  that Suppressive Persons don't exist.

This is, not quite, but almost,
 the same as saying "everybody is an anti-social personality",
 and that is so that Allen Hacker (Speaker)
 does not stick out and is not detected anymore
 as a Suppressive Person - which is his purpose
  since who knows how many years.



Now we know already that suppressive or
 anti-social personalities have everything in reverse.


Truth, full data, are lies to them;
 survival intentions are destructive intentions to them;
 doing good to them is perceived by them as you doing evil;
 being mean to others,
  to them equals treating people fair and just
  and giving them what they deserve;
 stealing, to them equals taking that which is owed to them.

In short, Suppressive Persons, anti-social personalities,
 have it all in reverse.



So, when such a person uses and
 applies the term "Suppressive Person"
 he means either
 "everybody is a Suppressive Person" as David Miscavige
  (the former Head of the Church of Scientology,
   deposed on 30 December 1994) did,
 or he means "nobody is a Suppressive Person" as the
  ex-Scientologist and SP Allen Hacker (calling
   himself 'Speaker' for his one man ASC 'group') does.



Koos Nolst Trenite - Ron's Inspector

Copyright 1995 by Koos Nolst Trenite


 reference:
  RI-50R-Gi 'Archives of RI-xxi and RI-ACT-xx series'
             of 28 Dec 1994, Revised and Replaced 17 Mar 1995




  Enclosure:
   RI-10i  'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994


                                                    12 October 1994


                RI-10i 'Confronting a Suppressive'



      A GRADIENT SCALE OF CONFRONTING A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON

       (dedicated to C. B. Willis who asked me to write it
                 down for you and for herself)


from Ron's Inspector


Message # RI-10i for Internet




Here is a rough scale
 about how people confront a Suppressive.
 There are many more ways one can confront a Suppressive,
 and they would fit somewhere on this scale.




I first wrote points 1 to 25.
 Then I noticed some points of
 'going to an SP,' which comes before 'being with an SP,'
 so I numbered them in the negative.



-7. Joining the SP in order to be as evil as one wants to be
 without being restrained.


-6. Joining the SP in order to show decent people how evil
 they are.


-5. Going to the Suppressive in order to be made unaware of
 the crimes that one has just committed.


-4. Feeling bad about one's own evil intentions and going to
 the Suppressive in order to "feel good" again.


-3. Being betrayed by one's friends and going to an SP in order
 to gain validation from the SP and to gain "protection against
 one's friends." Taking the support of an SP.


-2. Going to an SP in order to let oneself be suppressed, with
 the idea to try and "prove to oneself and to others that the
 Suppressive Person is harming survival," or to "give the SP a
 chance to be decent."
The actual intention is to give the SP an opportunity to be as
 evil or criminal as he wants to be, but to keep up an image to
 oneself and to others that one disagrees with the SP.


-1. Going to the SP to pretend to want to make him saner,
 but actually, to make a deal with him which turns out to be
 a validation of his evil intentions, for instance by selling
 something for well below the viable price of producing the
 product, or otherwise validating his evil intention to get
 something for nothing or at the expense of others.




Here now follow other ways by which people confront the
 existence of or association with a Suppressive Person.


1. Having the SP create your role, your beingness, your space,
 your viewpoint.

"What will the SP want from me? That's what I should find out
 and then do. What does the SP think about another person,
 about a subject?
 That's how I shall think about that other person, about that
 subject."


This is a bottom-scale handling of a Suppressive Person.
People do this to handle SPs.

In this way they don't get hit by the Suppressive, all is fine,
 there are flows, no ridges. It is possible to have Affinity,
 a pretended but pleasant Affinity for the SP.

One also has no own viewpoint, no own initiative, no real liking
 for oneself, nor for others.
One has absolutely no responsibility for the Suppressive, nor
 for oneself, nor for others.

"I am there, but I am not there as myself."

That's quite a bottom-scale "handling" of Suppressives.


2. Above that would be, being killed while in such a State, or
 being kicked out by the SP while in such a state as described
 under 1.

This would actually be higher, because one is, though against
 one's will or initiative, removed from the SP.


3. Higher still would be, to be shot or otherwise kicked out of
 the sphere of the SP by someone who is outside, who does not
 belong to the SP, but who is fighting the SP.


4. Higher than that would be the action of (3.) above, but while
 being AWARE that it was done by someone opposing the SP.


5. Then there is being ordered to leave the sphere of influence
 of the SP by someone, at gunpoint, under penalty of being
 killed or severely punished.


6. Higher than that would be as (3.), but this time being aware
 that it was done by someone of GOOD intentions to oneself.


7. A. Knowing about the SP and doing as if it is not an SP.

 Not telling anybody what one observes.
 "It is not my job to handle him."
"If somebody else handles him that's fine. I won't do it."
"I will just suffer through any damage he is doing to me and
 others." "If I tell anybody else or if I tell the SP that
 I know he is an SP, I will get hit - so I won't tell anybody."


7. B. "If I get a chance, without the SP noticing it, I will try
 to not fully execute his orders. Maybe I won't get caught."

"But if anybody points out that I am suppressing others by
 executing the Orders of the SP, I will get very angry and very
 right and defend my position, even though I know I use this
 position to suppress people."


7. C. "I will find a place or area were I don't have to execute
 the suppressive orders of the SP, but I won't talk about the
 reason why I went somewhere else, nor about the SP, in order to
 not get hit and in order to not lose friends who want to stay
 in comm with the SP, friends who want to continue to support
 the SP."

"I will do what I want."


7. D. "I will tell people about the SP if they want to hear it.
 If they don't want to know about the SP, I won't help them to
 start to look at the SP."
"I cannot make people more ethical, that is their own
 responsibility."
"I have already enough trouble myself."
"I do not want to be attacked by my friends."


7. E. Disconnecting from the SP, not wanting to know or hear
 anything about a Suppressive.
Forbidding others to talk about the Suppressive.
Forbidding others to find out about the Suppressive.
 "They just must disconnect as well."
"We don't want to know about him," "We don't want to hear about
 him," "We don't want to put any attention on him because we
 know he is an SP."
"We don't take responsibility for such people until they stop
 being Suppressives by themselves.


7. F. "Suppressives are those that are declared Suppressive by
 the authorities."
"It is not my duty and I do not have the knowledge and I
 cannot have enough data anyway to decide whether someone is
 a Suppressive."
"I do not want to get in conflict with the authorities because
 that would greatly hinder my survival."

"Others are stronger than I am anyway."

"I like people, it would be arrogant of me to say someone is
 a Suppressive. Everybody has faults, so, who am I to judge?"


7. G. "My enemies might be Suppressives, my friends certainly
 are not."
"It's all a matter of what side one is on and what game one
 is playing, and people are playing different games.
 So it's actually only a consideration and it's only a matter
 of viewpoint that people believe that an opponent is a
 Suppressive.
So even when I believe somebody is a Suppressive he might not
 really be one. He is just opposing me."
"I am also having some bad intentions myself."





Now we are slowly coming into the area of what we normally call
 'handling Suppressives.'



8. Being told by someone to not go to a Suppressive, with some
 penalty attached to it.


9. Hearing that someone is a Suppressive.


10. Examining the source of that information that says about
 someone that he or she is a Suppressive, examining the evidence
 presented.


11. Being asked to detect a Suppressive in one's environment
 or group.


12. Detecting the wrong SP. (Desire to handle SPs will
 eventually lead to the correct SP.)


13. Diminishing contact and support of a wrongly detected SP
 (comment as above).


14. Detecting the right SP and diminishing contact and support
 for that SP.


15. Being audited about the SP, resulting in more own stability
 and rise in happiness.

15. A. Being audited on the Suppressed Person Rundown in order
 to really fully confront the SP oneself. That means to look at,
 and to find out about the crimes of the SP in auditing, and
 regaining lifeforce that was fixed onto the SP.

15. B. If able and trained to do so, audit the SP in
 Solo sessions.

15. C. Report crimes of the SP, uncovered by auditing others or
 by Solo Auditing, per HCOPL 'Confessionals - Ethics Reports
 required.'

15. D. Audit others on the SP. Get others to audit people on
 the SP.


16. Informing others about the SP.


17. Getting others to read your information about the SP.


18. Getting some people to diminish their support for the SP.


19. Getting others to investigate the SP.


20. Making the evidence about the SP known.


21. Getting the SP removed from his post.


22. Getting decent production going again.


23. Getting the people who helped to remove the SP, audited on
 the SP, as these people will be most valuable to detect and
 handle further or future SPs.


24. Cleaning up the mess that the SP and his 'friends' made.


25. Cleaning up the 'friends' of the SP and auditing them about
 the SP. In the course of that, some 'friends' of the SP may
 turn out to be themselves SPs.




As you see we have not needed the cooperation of the SP.
We have not needed to audit the SP, except indirectly, by
 getting audited oneself about the SP and probably getting
 others audited about the SP, (or oneself auditing others about
 the SP.)


This would be some kind of scale of confronting a Suppressive,
 and we can go higher than that into the area of preventing the
 SP from doing future damage, or from doing damage elsewhere.

We can go into handling past damage the Suppressive has done,
 which basically falls into the activity of auditing people
 about the SP.

(The SP David Miscavige has done a lot of damage in the distant
 past to very very many people. Only because THAT damage done
 by him - which was to make very very many people unaware,
 AND on top of that, unaware of WHO made them be suddenly
 unaware - was never handled or audited out, only therefore
 could David Miscavige again come to power and again try to
 damage people spiritually in the name of Freedom.)


We could go into rehabilitating the SP to such an extent that
 he could be taught that it is actually possible for him to
 contribute to others, to Mankind, in some simple way.
That would largely depend on his own desire. But if we have come
 this far up the scale with him, and have done a lot of auditing
 of the people around him, the willingness of the SP to be
 rehabilitated is probably sufficient to proceed with that.


Koos Nolst Trenite - Ron's Inspector

Copyright 1994 by Koos Nolst Trenite