4 June 1995
RI-200i 'Fair Game Law - Disconnection'
from Ron's Inspector
Message # RI-200i for Internet
Message # RI-FGS-3 (Fair Game Series #3)
Not only have Suppressive Persons successfully corrupted
the idea of the Fair Game Law,
they also have very thoroughly perverted
the idea and concept and practise of "disconnecting".
These are attempts by criminals
similar to trying to repeal (cancel)
or suspend or make invalid for them
the law
that one is being prosecuted
and sentenced to a certain punishment
for murdering another or others.
The perversion of an ethical concept
is done to and by both sides, curiously enough,
both
by the people who want to treat others as Fair Game, AND
by the people who are being subjected to Fair Game -
and this perversion of an ethical concept
is also done
by people who are disconnecting AND
by people who are subjected to being disconnected from others.
I told you many times
that
A SURVIVAL LAW, RULE, POLICY
WHEN PUT INTO THE HANDS OF A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON
IS TURNED INTO IT'S OPPOSITE.
You can GUIDE life with laws, rules and policy,
but you can not handle, you can not let life be handled
by laws, rules and policy.
Life is handled by people, by individuals,
and when that individual
who does the handling of life,
happens to be a Suppressive Person
then the result is suppressed life,
no matter how wise and survival
the laws, rules and policy are.
This is why the Kingdom of Solomon
is now mostly desert sand,
this is why the Kingdom of Dionysius
in Sicily, [Italy, Europe]
is now in ruins,
and populated by Mafiosi [organised criminals],
this is why Scientology was almost destroyed
by the Suppressive Person David Miscavige,
if Koos had not saved it and
if Koos, together with L. Ron Hubbard,
had not thrown out the SP David Miscavige.
I have already explained to you
- in Fair Game Series 1 and Fair Game Series 2 -
what Fair Game actually means.
(RI-58i 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95,
RI-156i 'Fair Game Series - 2' of 24 Apr 1995)
Citizens from Sparta [in old Greece]
who want to destroy Athens [in old Greece],
do not have the same rights, in Athens,
as Athenian Citizens.
So what is this "disconnecting" all about?
1. Disconnecting is a means of handling communications
which are of such a nature
that you can't handle them easily enough by other means.
It requires some honest modesty:
"I am not able or I do not have the resources, at present,
to take responsibility for this person.
But my attention is caught up in it so much
that this endangers my own survival
and diminishes the support
I would otherwise be able to give to my friends.
In order to free up my attention again,
I disconnect from the person
who absorbs my attention too strongly."
You 'handle' the communication to and from a person or group,
- when choosing to disconnect, -
by NOT receiving nor giving communications anymore.
You see: It gets too complicated.
You can't figure out
what piece of stimulus-response
this guy or girl is throwing at you, and
whom he or she is really fighting,
and you don't seem to be in proper control anymore
of your own thoughts and what you say,
so a solution is to 'disconnect', let things cool off,
give the other and yourself some opportunity
to get de-stimulated, to become more rational.
And then you get yourself some auditing
to find out what it was all about,
so that you now can face and handle the other person.
That is intended immediately for the well-being
of the person disconnecting
and indirectly for the well-being of the person
who is disconnected.
But this can go the other way,
and has been used to do the reverse.
A Suppressive Person uses,
- all these things have been done
long before Scientology,
life existed before Scientology also, you know -
(I repeat) a Suppressive Person ALSO uses 'disconnection',
but he uses it
in order to "show" to people how evil they are.
He, for some social reasons, usually,
can't say to another "You are evil"
but he says "I disconnect from you."
(Remark on the side:
Boy, do YOU have a lot to learn about Suppressive Persons!
They have everything IN REVERSE.
And if you think you can ever be free without
a thorough study and knowledge of Suppressive Persons,
you are dreaming!
OK, we are going to look at
a more causative application of disconnection.)
2. Disconnection can be an ability,
that is, an ability and a way to stop somebody
from having a psychotic break
or to stop or diminish somebody's psychotic behaviour.
It is not actually disconnecting at all,
and you can't really call it disconnection,
because you continue to listen to the person
and you continue to look where his bullets will land,
but you don't give him any oxygen to feed the fire
and you don't hand him any boxes of ammunition.
And usually, when so handled,
a person's psychotic break diminishes
and a psychotic calms down remarkably.
This action 2 has the apparency of disconnection,
even though it is not an actual disconnection.
On the other hand,
disconnection as described under 1,
meaning refusing any and all communication
from and to a psychotic or suppressive,
sometimes, or maybe even quite often,
has the same effect as 2,
because the psychotic THINKS you are doing
the more ethical, the more causative
and more responsible 2 to him,
while in fact he was being treated
with actual, 'don't know any further' disconnection
as described under 1.
(This can be very confusing by the way,
when a Suppressive Person disconnects from you.
Not knowing that he or she is suppressive to you,
you think he or she is helping you
to stop a dramatization you have.)
Now to make it more complicated,
when we want the group, the whole group,
to disconnect from a psychotic or suppressive,
we actually only mean definition 2,
which means
"don't provide him with ammunition, with oxygen,
because we know
he will only use the love and life given to him
as fuel for his rockets
and for destroying life with the life we offer him."
You see, he uses and sucks in life that comes his way,
(he uses that) to destroy life with.
This is for instance what Jon Atack does.
Life in the form of Scientology came his way,
and he used this life-force in order to become a writer,
but instead of writing poems down, which he can do very well,
he instead writes books
to destroy the life-force that gave him life.
You might want to understand the logic of this:
He knows he should not be alive
because he considers himself too evil for that.
So, giving him life force,
as Scientology did many years for him,
was, according to himself, actually making him more evil,
do you follow?
So, because Scientology made him more alive and more creative,
- which to him, for himself,
equals to 'he being more able to be evil' -
he said, "Therefore Scientology is evil to me".
Because he CONSIDERED it made him more evil,
he then also said "Scientology is evil to others".
And because he thinks everybody is as evil as he is,
he says "Scientology makes people evil"
and he writes a book about that,
and he thinks that it is a book about Scientology,
where in actual fact it's a book about himself
trying to prove to others that he is evil.
You see how group disconnection, as in number 2,
would diminish Jon Atack's psychotic break,
and that other kinds of help than 2, offered to him,
would only increase his psychotic break
because HE, Jon Atack,
thinks that helping HIM is making HIM more evil,
he "knows" that,
he "knows" that anybody who wants to help HIM
to be more capable, more able, more aware,
more intelligent, more forceful,
is giving HIM the opportunity and the ability to be more evil,
and he knows he will take that opportunity.
So he says:
"Anybody who helps ME
to actually and truly become more able,
wants ME to be evil,"
and therefore he "knows" that Scientology is evil,
and he goes on to prove this and writes a book about this.
It's like kicking a criminal out of his prison cell
back onto the street:
it's just forcing the criminal
to commit more crimes on others,
which the criminal knows very well
he would not have committed
if he would have stayed in his prison cell,
if you would have permitted him to stay in prison.
This is a complaint you occasionally read about in newspapers.
Some criminal is interviewed:
"If you had detected me earlier
and arrested me earlier and kept me in prison,
I would not have raped and murdered
four more little girls from the neighborhood.
Why were you so mean to me
as to not detect and arrest me earlier?"
Well, the explanation of this issue
was discovered and made known
by L. Ron Hubbard:
"MAN IS BASICALLY GOOD."
MAN does not want to be made more evil.
And when you are faced with making an evil person less evil,
you are faced with the problem
of making him into being more able to be evil.
And this he doesn't want
- he rather stays less able,
so he does not have to take the responsibility for himself
of figuring out
how he can be able and NOT evil at the same time.
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ron's Inspector
Copyright 1995 by Koos Nolst Trenite
reference:
RI-58i 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95
RI-156i 'Fair Game Series - 2' of 24 Apr 1995
RI-111i 'The evil Justice Chief System' of 16 Mar 1995
RI-50R-Mi 'Archives of RI-xxi and RI-ACT-xx series'
of 28 Dec 1994, Revised and Replaced 21 May 1995
ftp: thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI/ACT

Back to the RI-Bulletin index.