15 August 1995



        RI-256i  'Cleaning up the Internet - IMPORTANT'


from Ron's Inspector

Message # RI-256i for Internet



       Subtitle:  Ron's Inspector Order on Internet to OSA




CORRECT Definition of 'OSA':

  THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL AFFAIRS (OSA)
   IS MEANT TO DELIVER SCIENTOLOGY SERVICES
    OF ANY DESIRED OR REQUIRED KIND
     TO NON-SCIENTOLOGISTS AND
     TO NON-MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY.
     (Unless they are already given service
      by the Public Division of any Church of Scientology.)

  All services of OSA are normally given
   as a free service to the community.
  They are financed by donations
   of members to the various Churches of Scientology
   and often involve voluntary work
    by responsible Church members.





The Scientology-scriptures
 which should be posted to Internet
  are mainly the wealth
  of LRH[L.Ron Hubbard]-material
   on how to understand insanity, and
   on how to detect hidden, covered up insanity, and
   on how insane people, when detected, can be handled.
    Understanding insane people is itself already a handling.

This handles
  the anti-Scientology-, the anti-social-, the hate-,
  and the other confusing posters to Internet.



If you want to be sophisticated, or thorough, or professional,
 then
  you take a post from someone on Internet,
  and you find the applicable parts or sections
   of an LRH-policy or LRH-lecture or -bulletin or -essay,
  and YOU POST THAT (only that)
   AS AN ANSWER AND RESPONSE
   TO THE CONFUSED OR UNINFORMED POSTER.

Maybe that does not handle
  the confusion of the poster you responded to
  to the extent that you would like to help him,
 but it diminishes his or her confusion,
 and it DOES handle the confusion
  which that poster created in other readers.


There is for instance
  a very extensive amount of LRH-material
  on failed students of Scientology,
 and there are many failed students posting to Internet.


Even if it does not handle their confusion,
 it does handle the confusion they create for other readers.
And it provides very valuable data
 for those who are not confused.


This would clean up the whole Internet in no time,
 when it is actually being done as I describe above,
 on a professional basis.



Another, important point is
 that many posters to Internet
  are drug-users or have been drug-users
  or worse than anything, they have used the drug
   which produces lasting insanity, a drug called LSD.

These people can not be unconfused really by giving them data,
 especially not by giving them data about Ethics,
  because Ethics equals survival,
  and taking drugs equals
   'wanting to NOT survive and calling that survival'.
  (All drug-users do use drugs
   in order to run away from
   and in order to not be responsible for some part of life.)


So drug-users are opposed to Ethics.

And particular drugs gave them the feeling or sensation
 that it is much more pleasant to NOT survive (like heroin does).
Other drugs gave them the very strong impression
 that it is very beautiful to NOT survive.
  (Homer Wilson Smith, a heavy LSD-user,
  is almost weekly posting about the beauty of not surviving,
  of taking hallucinatory drugs.)


Therefore,
 LRH-material on Ethics (Ethics equals survival)
 are heavily opposed and shunned and invalidated by drug-users,
  and usually by former drug-users as well.
 (Jon Atack opposes Scientology publicly
  because he is an LSD-user.)


So for this category (drug-users)
 - both to un-confuse them
   and to help others to understand their posts
    and to understand their hidden motives
     for opposing or confusing others about Scientology -
 we post LRH-material on drugs, and we post LRH-material
  on recognizing and handling drug-users or former drug-users.


We can get across to them, or at least to their family,
  their friends or associates,
 that it IS possible to survive without drugs,
 and we show that at least others believe
  that it is much much more fun for everyone around
  to create and to enjoy life without drugs.




We have therefore mainly two types of material
 to be posted to Internet in order to clean it up:

1. Very specific LRH-material on Ethics,
    preferably - but not necessarily -
    in direct response to a confusing poster.


2. Any and all material on drug-users,
    on the harm done by drugs,
    on the remedy of this harm,
    on helping people to come off drugs,
    on the characteristics of LSD-users,
   etcetera.



As a final note,
 there is a way of posting LRH-material
 so that it communicates well to any reader.
While it is not a burden
 for someone of high Intelligence Quotient
  to read something written for or by someone with lower IQ,
 it IS a burden for someone with average IQ
  to read something written for a person
   who has an unusually high IQ.

So it is really very bad taste
  to not edit material of LRH,
 but to post it in such a way
  that it can not be duplicated EASILY AND COMFORTABLY
  by the public for which it is intended.

(One refers in a footnote to the original unedited LRH-text
 and to where this text can be found.)




So there you go, do it like this, and do it.

And if you DON'T do it,
 you will not only incur (get)
  the wrath of Ron's Inspector,
 but you will also soon have
  the wrath of the millions of people on Internet,
 a small portion of which you have ALREADY on your neck.



Koos Nolst Trenite - Ron's Inspector

Copyright 1995 by Koos Nolst Trenite


 references:
  RI-177i  'The Horrible Crime of OSA on INTERNET' of 10 May 95
  RI-227i  'OSA PR people on alt.religion.scientology' 4 Jul 95

  RI-252i  'WHO in OSA ordered ... a.r.s. destroyed?' 5 Aug 1995
  RI-254i  'The "Destroyer" Mike Rinder (CO OSA INT)' 10 Aug 95

  RI-255i  'Correction to Scn's WWW-pages' of 13 Aug 1995

  RI-25i  'PTS-Declare Type C of OSA-Staff' of 19 Nov 1994
  RI-84i  'Ron's Inspector Order to OSA' of 5 Feb 1995

  RI-83i  'The Right to Study and Apply Scientology' 16 Jun 1994
  RI-166i  'Who owns the Church of Scientology?' of 1 May 1995

  RI-ACT-11  'The Failed Cases on A.C.T.' of 2 Nov 1994
  RI-85R-Bi  'Institutional Cases on A.R.S.' of 8 Feb 95
  RI-252i-A  'Definition of Reality' of 5 Aug 1995

  RI-10i  'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994
  RI-ACT-103 'The anti-Scientologist Homer W. Smith' of 8 Aug 95

  RI-73i  'On Scientology Ethics' of 26 Jan 1995
  RI-129i  'Ron's Inspector Purposes' of 31 Mar 1995

  RI-226i  'On Simple Definitions of Scientology Terms' 4 Jul 95


  RI-50R-Mi 'Archives of RI-xxi and RI-ACT-xx series'
             of 28 Dec 1994, Revised and Replaced 21 May 1995

  ftp: thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
       thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI/ACT



 Enclosure:
  RI-177i  'The Horrible Crime of OSA on INTERNET' of 10 May 95


                                                     10 May 1995



       RI-177i  'The Horrible Crime of OSA on INTERNET'



from Ron's Inspector


Message # RI-177i for Internet




Nobody stated it, and everybody knows it.


So I think it is time to state
 what the horrible crime of OSA on INTERNET is:


 THEY DO NOT POST WANTED AND NEEDED
 LRH-MATERIAL ON THE INTERNET.



They do not prevent the material being put in public libraries
 by Golden Era Productions,
 by the publishers of Scientology-materials.


You can check the content
 of the United States Library of Congress
 for books and course-packs by L. Ron Hubbard,
 and you will get quite a long list.

Now, I think that a lot of people
 do not have the money to fly to the capital of the USA,
 and to stay there long enough to read all the books.

But I do think that a lot of people on the INTERNET
 are desperate to have this material
 to lead a better life,
 to help their children with their study,
 to be able to hold a job without too much trouble,
 to handle or prevent accidents and illnesses,
 to obtain relief at times of
  losses or separation from those one loves,
 to understand the phenomena of death,
 to get an understanding of oneself and others.



What are the justifications of OSA
 for NOT PUTTING THESE VITAL DATA ON LIFE
 onto the Internet?


"It's not their job - OSA is there to correct falsehoods
 about Scientology
 put out by people of very bad intentions towards life."

"Internet is the wrong place
 for putting out Scientology-material,
 because psycho's like Dennis Erlich
 or Diane Richardson or Jim Diver
 will pervert it and will confuse people about it
  - as this is their sole purpose in life,
  to confuse people and to keep them confused."


And what OSA really wants is a "safe space"
 where Scientology material can be communicated around the globe
 without those psychotics trying to upset and confuse everyone
 about Scientology.


Well, we live in a very very insane world
 because of the inability of people to recognize and restrain
 such very big psychotics as I mentioned here.

And in others places than Internet
 it isn't really much different.



You tell someone about Scientology,
 you give him vital data for improving his life,
 and some true psychotics like David Worrell
 or Allen 'Speaker' Hacker comes along and says
 "Scientology is nonsense, I know much more about life."


That is also happening in life
 and we don't take that as a justification
 to commit the horrible crimes on others
 of NOT GIVING THEM SCIENTOLOGY MATERIAL
 WHICH IS VITAL TO THEIR LIVES.


OSA does not confront the psychotics,
 the suppressive persons on Internet,
 and uses it as an excuse, as a justification,
 to NOT POST VITAL LRH-MATERIAL.


And THAT is the horrible crime of OSA on INTERNET.



Koos Nolst Trenite - Ron's Inspector

Copyright 1995 by Koos Nolst Trenite