13 September 1995
updated 30 October 1997
RI-267i 'Omitted Data on Waging and Ending Wars'
from Ambassador for Mankind
Message # RI-267i for Internet
What is omitted by all "great" or outright criminal generals
of ancient and modern times
is the fact
that wars are a very destructive way of handling problems.
But, in order to stop another or others from
executing destructive intentions,
one is sometimes forced to use military destructive actions.
And here comes the omitted but very vital datum,
and that is:
the opponent
(or maybe even some undetected individual in your own camp)
WANTS the destruction
of people and property and
WANTS the destruction of survival activities.
SO, YOU THREATENING THEM WITH FURTHER WAR AND
THE THREAT THAT
THEIR GROUP AND THEIR COUNTRY WILL BE ATTACKED MORE HEAVILY,
THE THREAT THAT THEIR OWN POPULATION
WILL SUFFER MORE LOSS AND DAMAGE AND GRIEF,
- THAT THREAT - IS NOT AT ALL MAKING THEM INCLINED
TO STOP THEIR HOSTILITIES!
This is not the advice
that generals are giving in their text books, you know.
They omit the fact that most opponents WANT war,
to the bitter end of total destruction
of their own country,
of their own group,
of their own family
and
ultimately, of themselves.
We have examples of that throughout history.
Decent people don't act like this.
And generals think they are playing a game of chess
against a decent opponent.
These generals, and these are almost all the generals,
are too stupid to realize and inform their governments
and population of
the fact that their opponent
plays not at all the same game
but a totally different game,
despite what the opponents put out as propaganda.
History books are complete jokes on this.
These writers, especially of schoolbooks,
think they can convince children to believe
that wars are about economics and territory.
I am very very sorry to disappoint
your very hard won school-"knowledge" on this,
because you DON'T win economics and territory by WAR,
as we have seen with the example of Russia, now,
and as we will see with China's Tibet.
War is psychosis,
but you have to defend yourselves very well
against psychotic heads of states who wage wars.
And the currently known and current practical defense
against it is to have an army, a very well equipped army.
Back to history.
The only game Adolf Hitler
(and the gang of criminals
which he put in government positions,) had,
was
first:
- destroy their own German government, which they did in 1933,
- destroy law and order in their own country, Germany,
which they did since 1933,
and
- to destroy law and order and the economy and the culture
of people in Europe, which they did since 1938,
and
- to destroy the happiness of people world wide,
which they did from 1941 up to 1945.
THEY NEVER HAD THE INTENTION TO WIN THE WAR,
and this was a constant source of astonishment,
of bewilderment and of confusion,
both to the German people
who were tricked into supporting
a German government of violent criminals,
and to the allies
who fought or who tried to appease
this violently criminal German Government.
The truth is - and this is omitted
by all the stupid text books of stupid generals
who played their mediocre parts in history -
criminal governments start wars
in order to destroy their own country,
in order to destroy other countries and
in order to destroy themselves.
So the solution is not
- as some utter idiots from England proposed and did -
to burn the whole of Germany down
by 5 years of bombing from the air.
Because that was exactly following the hidden intentions
of Adolf Hitler and his criminal Government!
Do you understand this now?
Hitler and his team of criminal ministers and helpers
had the actual intention to destroy Germany
and, if possible, also the rest of Europe.
And the English and the Canadians and Americans
helped them marvelously with that
by 4 years of bombing and shelling Germany,
which the allies even paid for!
The way to handle this is, of course,
to kill, or otherwise remove, Adolf Hitler and other criminals
from the government,
until none are left there who
want to destroy their own country
and their own economy and their own population.
So at the moment of this writing
you would, on planet Earth,
remove
Milosevic and Karadic from their positions in government
in Yugoslavia (or Bosnia as part of it is called now again)
and you would remove Saddam Hussein and his minister Assis
from their government positions in Iraq,
and you would remove some people
(whose name I don't know at the moment)
from the government of China,
and some from the government of Iran.
INSTEAD OF CARPETING THE WHOLE COUNTRY
WITH 2 FEET OF BOMBS (OR RADIOACTIVE WASTE
WHICH MAKES IT UNINHABITABLE FOR THE NEXT 20,000 YEARS).
So the missing datum is
that heads of state and members of government,
who have the intention to destroy their country,
will not stop their aggression against their own people
and against neighboring countries
when you threaten
or carry out random military actions against the WHOLE country.
Also, their possible promises
to not attack you or
to not attack other countries, or
to not attack their own people,
are worth nothing and cannot be relied on
unless you can actually enforce those promises
by economic or military measures
AGAINST THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO GOVERN.
The main point is
that, despite all their propaganda,
they WANT to destroy their own country and their own group.
And in fact,
if their propaganda had been
"We are the Party that wants to destroy our country and
wants to destroy your family and
wants you to live in misery or in poverty
or in prison or tortured to death",
they would not have gotten much support from the population
to carry out their purposes.
So their propaganda says something quite different,
like
"We want to give our nation a great name again.
"We want to purify our country from
the evil influences of Islamic, Christian, Jewish,
Hindu, Negro, American, etc. culture."
"We want to right the wrongs
that had been done to our country."
"We combat unemployment by letting you all make weapons."
and "Everybody who disagrees with us is our enemy."
If that propaganda was done well,
they would get 60 percent of the population behind them,
happily and unknowingly busy to destroy their own country.
What we are talking about here
is the removal of, between one and maybe twenty, individuals
from the government of a country
INSTEAD OF waging a war
involving the death of 3 Million soldiers and
a whole country completely in rubble and ashes!
Now you choose what is the most survival course of action and
the cheapest course of action, and
the fastest course of action and
the most decent course of action, and
the course of action
which causes the least suffering and
the most benefit FOR ALL WARRING PARTIES.
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind
Copyright 1995, 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite
Personal Web-page:
http://ArtOrg.com
Personal Web-Library:
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/
Library Search Engine:
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/search.html
References (available also at the Library "http://Art-Org.com"):
- About Society, Power, War
RI-543i 'Dictators' of 22 July 1994
RI-939i 'Jane Fonda Interview On Understanding War' of 5 Oct 1997
RI-929i 'Simple Detection: "Sane or Insane?"' of 11 Sept 1997
RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
RI-629i 'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
RI-705i 'Society Resurgence, Use of Rules' of 9 Oct 1996
RI-750i 'Crimes are not motivated by money' of 1 Dec 1996
RI-71Ri 'How Hitler trapped the German People' of 22 Jan 1995
RI-603i 'Capitalist - Industrialist - Employee' of 21 Oct 1995
- About helping people
RI-631i 'Definition of "Woman"' of 12 July 1996
RI-629i 'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
RI-781BPI 'Raising Children - or Keeping Them Small?' of 16 Jan 1997
RI-537i 'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996
RI-801i '"You can never leave" - The spiritual universe' of 14 Mar 1997
RI-785i 'On Not Remedying Disagreements - "Not Talking"' of 24 Jan 1997
RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
RI-705i 'Society Resurgence, Use of Rules' of 9 Oct 1996
RI-925i 'Restoring life-force - Affinity for who and what IS THERE' Aug 97
RI-918i 'Spiritual Power defined correctly' of 4 Aug 1997
- About facing evil and insanity
RI-908i 'The Ostrich-factor - on facing evil or criminality' 16 July 97
RI-926i 'I do not respect the right of others to be insane' of 19 Aug 1997
RI-058Ri 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95
RI-487i 'Dialogue: On Enemies and Hostility' of 20 Feb 1996
RI-535i '"An Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend" = INSANE' 10 Apr 96
- About RI-Bulletins
RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996
These references and other RI-Bulletins can be obtained, for instance,
at the Library of Koos' writings on
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/usp.htm
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/telepathy.htm
or at the Archives at
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI/USP
Back to the RI-Bulletin index.