8 October 1995
RI-274i 'Setting Own Awareness-Level - Use of Vital Data'
from Ron's Inspector
Message # RI-274i for Internet
There is something called a level of awareness,
that is,
how much do you decide to be aware of.
How much do you say:
"No, I don't want to know about these things,
because that would change my game!"
"All my actions so far
are based on not knowing about Scientology
- I am NOT going to change that!"
"I am earning my living by
not knowing what the Reactive Mind is,
so that I can continue to charge people 100,000 US $ a year
and not do anything for them.
I am not going to drop that successful action!"
At this time
children play with computer-games on a viewscreen
and these games have the possibility
to set it to play at an easy, or at a difficult level.
This compares in life
to the awareness level
which you have set for yourself
in playing the game of life.
When they are born, most people
set their awareness level very low,
they are aware of a tiny body
which they have decided to call their own
and take control of.
What have they decided to be aware of,
and what level of difficulty have they chosen?
They have chosen to be aware of a small body
and a very few things which happen around the body,
like dirty and wet nappies or trousers,
like breasts filled with milk and
whether the body does not get cold.
Of course these levels of awareness,
- which they chose to have, or set for themselves -
shortly after birth,
are
very different
from person to person.
But
I have probably described
the awareness level
many people have set for themselves
immediately after birth.
When we return to compare this to our computer game,
the game would be set
to more or less the lowest level (of difficulty),
meaning
the easiest level of play:
body hungry - shout - food received,
body cold or wet - shout - shout - shout
- clean clothes given.
That is a very easy game
at a very low awareness-setting.
Now you may also note that
you, on the baby-level,
are almost completely dependent
on your environment
for surviving or not surviving,
and you, on the baby-level, exert
practically no control over your environment.
This is the average person's level which
one sets one's awareness to
when one gets born.
Such a very low awareness level
is not very pleasant for others to experience, though,
and I find it always a great relief
to see a baby who did set his awareness level much higher,
who looks at me, who smiles at me
and who is quite alive and aware of his environment,
even though he can't yet make his body talk or walk.
Now we look at the other end,
at old people and
what THEY set their awareness level to,
what level of difficulty they choose
for the game which is their life.
They decide to leave or agree to leave their job
in many countries at age 65 or so.
They decide to not be very aware anymore
of the process of earning things
by production of desirable objects for others or
by providing desirable services to others.
They decide to visit doctors frequently,
and play the game of
"what's wrong with their body",
rather than looking themselves at it
or continuing to go to work also with a headache.
I don't mean
that one should not ask a doctor
what's wrong with one's body:
in maybe twenty percent of the cases
they do know exactly what's wrong
and assist greatly in speedy recovery.
But when a person stops working
he gets prone to all kinds of 'diseases'
which fall in the category
of the eighty percent of symptoms
which a medical doctor
or a psychologist
or a psychiatrist
know absolutely nothing about.
In fact, they know much less than nothing about it,
because they pretend to know about it,
and, worse than that, they even pretend to know about it
when they KNOW that they don't have the faintest idea
of what's going on with their patient.
My brother - who is a medical doctor
whose intentions are rather benign (that means he means well) -
tells people to take two aspirins and go to bed early,
which is much better
then cutting somebody's nerves
or electroshocking him
in order to cover up one's OWN lack of knowledge.
So, who does know about these eighty percent
of the diseases which the retired person is likely to have?
A common farmer, or a sailor, for example.
The farmer says
"It's simple, he is sick because he isn't working!"
The sailor says
"It's simple, he is sick because he is sitting inside
at home the whole day!"
(This tells you immediately
that prisons are very very unhealthy institutions
for rehabilitation of criminals,
WHEN the criminals
are not allowed to produce valuable products or services
which they can be proud of and
WHEN they are prevented from
experiencing space and nature (like a garden for instance).
But I still have to teach Mankind
how to treat criminals and
that the only purpose and intention
of punishment for crimes is
to bring a criminal to regain responsibility for,
and knowledge of,
HOW TO BRING ABOUT SURVIVAL FOR HIMSELF AND OTHERS.
On the other hand,
we have still a big task to teach DECENT people
the responsibility for, and knowledge of,
how to bring about survival for themselves and others.
Only teaching people how to handle criminals,
is definitely starting at the wrong end.
You first
teach the teachers what to teach and how to teach
(which they don't know in the present society)
and then you teach the children
which kinds of subjects they should learn and WHY,
and you teach them HOW to study.
(This is also not done or known in our present society.)
So we still have a lot of work to do.
Most of these things
have been now discovered and developed in Scientology,
but this subject, really,
is known to only a vanishingly small amount of people,
even forty years after its release.
Scientology is not even taught in Universities yet [it will be],
and there are very very few schools
and only very very very few companies
who use these new and vital developments.
The only thing about the subject of Scientology
which is known maybe only a little bit
to the man in the street, is
that studying Scientology
and making the vital new information
contained in Scientology known
is very very heavily opposed and fought by criminals
and anti-social elements in the society.)
We can observe the awareness level which
a society [a country, a group, a University,
a company, a police station, a school,
a law-court, a family, a TV-station]
sets for itself to play the game of life with:
Do they use modern vital data or
do they let themselves be
bullied or
shouted down or
governed into staying backwards
with their eyes closed to
new developments like Scientology?
What awareness level, by the way,
are you using to play the game of life with?
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ron's Inspector
Copyright 1995 by Koos Nolst Trenite
references:
RI-83i 'The Right to Study and Apply Scientology' 16 Jun 94
RI-84i 'Ron's Inspector Order to OSA' of 5 Feb 1995
RI-256i 'Cleaning up the Internet - IMPORTANT' of 15 Aug 1995
RI-61i 'The Right to be Evil' of 16 Dec 1994
RI-80Ri 'The Eternal Critics - Exposed' of 28 Jan 1995
RI-85R-Bi 'Institutional Cases on ARS' 8 Feb 95, rev 10 May 95
RI-261i 'Beggars WANT to produce ugliness ...' of 18 Aug 1995
RI-265i 'Critics of Scientology' of 6 Sep 1995
RI-269i 'How to Handle Irresponsible People.(GOLD!)' 26 Sep 95
RI-58i 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95
RI-73i 'On Scientology Ethics' of 26 Jan 1995
RI-76i 'To Hide or Find the Truth - ...' of 28 Jan 1995
RI-263i 'Two Responses to Being Helped' of 20 Aug 1995
RI-267i 'Omitted Data on Waging and Ending Wars' of 13 Sep 95
RI-10i 'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994
RI-90i 'The Intention of a Suppressive' of 9 Oct 1994
RI-50RNi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - The Future' of 28 Dec 1994
Revised and Replaced on 20 August 95
These RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or
via anonymous File Transfer Protocol.
ftp: thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI/ACT

Back to the RI-Bulletin index.