10 May 1996
RI-555i 'Confronting Mental Energy - Napoleon Bonaparte/Miscavige'
from Ambassador for Mankind (Ron's Inspector)
Message # RI-555i for Internet
Being able to define or identify and to handle
the mental energy
which another might throw at you,
is quite necessary
when one does not want to be
overwhelmed and controlled
by those
who want to control and manipulate others
as pawns in their games.
One such person
was David Miscavige
who was L. Ron Hubbard's big buddy and "friend",
and
L. Ron Hubbard
put this full blown criminal and psychotic
in charge of all of Scientology,
thereby violating practically ALL POLICY
LRH himself had written.
I have declared L. Ron Hubbard
to be a Suppressive Person
for that and other similar crimes against Mankind.
Miscavige is better known to many
as the equally psychotic 'Napoleon Bonaparte'
around 1800, in France.
Jutta, at that time called Marie Louise of Austria,
was forced
by Emperor Franz I of Austria and his 'Prime Minister' Metternich,
to marry this anti-social being
called Napoleon Bonaparte,
all of them well knowing that Napoleon was anti-social.
But Jutta refused to take any RESPONSIBILITY
for this knowledge, for her father Franz I, and for Metternich,
nor for Mankind.
She instead
'did what was wanted of her' from
the most criminal Metternich,
the most anti-social advisor to her father Emperor Franz I.
Metternich is now called Richard Reiss,
the violently anti-Scientology
Senior Case Supervisor of FLAG
in Clearwater, Florida.
Jutta, as Marie Louise of Austria, caved herself in,
and played the "good", completely irresponsible wife
of "Emperor" Napoleon Bonaparte.
She considerably contributed
to the crimes of Napoleon Bonaparte
against his country, France, and
against Mankind.
Now Jutta has to take enough responsibility
for what she did then,
in order to be able
to take sufficient responsibility
for L. Ron Hubbard.
Sufficient, meaning,
that she can not be restimulated by LRH
into her past decisions
to be completely irresponsible
for Napoleon/Miscavige.
Confessional session by Jutta Nolst Trenite (SOLO),
on 8 February 1996, 21:38 GMT,
ordered by Ambassador for Mankind.
(Reported per HCOPL 'Confessionals - Ethics Reports Required')
[Solo-Auditor:] How would [the fixed solution]
'NOT BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR (not controlling)
THE (MENTAL) ENERGY OF NAPOLEON'
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"I can use as a justification
that Napoleon overwhelmed me
[when Jutta was Marie-Louise of Austria
forced by Franz I and Metternich
to marry Napoleon],
and
that since 1810 I am no longer my energetic, high-toned self.
"This wouldn't help me to get income [to survive],
but gives an explanation, and
this should help me
to escape confront of the energy of Napoleon."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right?
"[It makes me right]
for owning nothing this lifetime.
"Also under Napoleon Bonaparte I OWNED nothing
(although surrounded by luxury and abundance).
"I didn't make it mine,
I didn't care for it,
I didn't mind whether I had it or not."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right?
"For not caring for getting myself
what I WANT to have." LFBD
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right?
"For not caring what
Koos, Freya, Noel want to have."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right?
"The energy of Napoleon is there, and
it is connected to decisions of mine
to not be,
to not create,
to not have,
to not care.
"In my lifetime under Napoleon
I did not have to suffer the CONSEQUENCES of that:
I HAD luxury,
I had food bountiful [more than sufficiently],
I had places to stay and
I had no demands to pay rent,
I had transport,
I had culture, art, music, theater,
I painted,
I made music,
and
I didn't care where the money for it was coming from.
"I didn't care to have, but I had.
I was ordering, I was asking for what I wanted, and I got it.
No consequences for my decision to not care.
SOMEONE cared for me.
"Call it enforced havingness, but I had things.
I had what I wanted to have and what I didn't want to have.
And things were there, whether I put them there or not.
"And I used them and didn't care
for the price of it,
for the maintenance of it.
"Next lifetime (Vincent Van Gogh)
I was again irresponsible for my havingness, or possessions.
"But then I REALLY didn't have anything
in the physical universe.
"And I justified that now
with:
>not needing MEST [material things]<,
>wanting to share the lives of the poorest<,
>unnecessary ballast<,
with
>being proud in excelling others in modesty<.
"And 'no money', I had to explain.
And I explained it with
'people are not ready yet for my paintings', etc.
instead of seeing
that I didn't WANT it, and
that Theo [the brother of Vincent Van Gogh]
refused to sell my paintings, too."
[Koos to Jutta:] Do the process on the energy THEN (1810)!
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right?
[Jutta:] "For having destroyed
my own beingness [what I myself wanted to BE in life],
my own [mental] space, my own viewpoint.
"In order to have my OWN space
I would have had to control and confront
the energy of Napoleon.
"I decided
'I can't have my OWN space, because of Napoleon'.
"But that is not the truth:
I DECIDED
that I WILL not confront the energy of Napoleon,
that is, the output of his intentions on me,
that I WILL NOT CONFRONT his Tone Levels [his emotions],
his intentions on Humanity.
">I will NOT confront his energy
[while] being in the same space with him<.
>I will NOT confront his energy
[while] being on his communication lines<.
"But anyway, near or far,
I decided to NOT confront his energy.
"It is reduced to the question now:
'Will I want to SURVIVE
with Napoleon's energy [also] somewhere [existing],
whether in my space or not,
OR
will I want to succumb?'
"[Meaning:
shall I]
crash my anchorpoints,
destroy my space,
destroy my own viewpoint,
give up my force,
have no own survival intention?
"It does not make me right for having
destroyed [my mental] space, [and, by consequence, having]
no own viewpoint,
no force."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right?
"For not being in my own 'valence'
[self-created role in life, 'being oneself'].
"In order to stay in my own valence,
as well as have my own space or viewpoint,
I WOULD have had to control the energy of Napoleon."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right?
"It would make me right
for having been in propitiation towards Napoleon.
"I did not WANT to be responsible
for the energy of Napoleon,
for his evil intentions,
for his force emanations.
"I refused to confront
the living lightning,
the brooding blackness,
the sneering '1.1-ness' [covert hostility],
the hateful attacks
of Napoleon,
and
I attempted to buy the danger off
by propitiation,
by pretended agreement.
But it didn't make his evil less.
"But, is it right to be in propitiation
towards a Suppressive Person?
"No, because such a 'Yes, sire' and devote attitude
doesn't help anyone, and
is in itself already not being responsible
for the energy of Napoleon."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right?
"For having refused to give help [then, to others].
"Here is this energy [of Napoleon] which shouts 'DON'T help!'
And there is the one who asks for help!
"And I would think only of 'how to escape Napoleon's energy'
[instead of helping others].
That doesn't seem right to me, now."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right? LFBD
"It doesn't seem to be right at all,
it isn't right at all!
It is no concern for other people.
"Only thinking how *I* could escape.
And not
'How can I help others to survive
who are ALSO LFBD
hit by the evil intentions of Napoleon,
who ALSO LFBD
get bombarded with his energy, and
are also
subjected to his evil intentions, and
much MORE than I
because *I* didn't risk my life
sitting in a luxurious salon in 'Empire' style,
while others died in some crazy battle
which Napoleon instigated'."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right? F
"For having
no Third Dynamic [no group] or
no Fourth Dynamic [no (responsibility for) Mankind]!" LFBD
"It made me right for
not caring for any Third Dynamic [group], and
not caring for the Fourth Dynamic [for Mankind]. LFBD
"Glad I found it [and looked at it]!
The force I mean - the facts I got already long ago
[in many earlier sessions]."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would
'not being responsible for (not controlling)
the (mental) energy of Napoleon'
make you right?
"For LEAVING the Third Dynamic [the group], any Third Dynamic,
TO Napoleon.
For LEAVING the Fourth Dynamic [Mankind]
TO Napoleon.
"That is similar to
leaving Scientology TO
Suppressive Persons,
meaning
taking NO responsibility
for the safety or well-being of others
because some Suppressive Persons are around.
"That is a very big overt [crime] on Humanity.
LFBD-F/Nind
Jutta Nolst Trenite"
[The abbreviations F(Fall) LFBD(Long Fall Blow Down) and
F/N(Floating Needle) describe reactions on the E-meter,
indicating mental charge (F, LFBD), and release of charge
completed (F/N).
"LFBD-F/N" = truth found out. "ind" = indicated to the person.]
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind
Copyright 1996 by Koos Nolst Trenite
references:
RI-40i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - EP' of 19 Dec 94
RI-41i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - I' of 18 Dec 94
RI-42i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - II' of 18 Dec 94
RI-43i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - III' 16 Dec 1994
RI-44i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - IV' of 15 Dec 94
RI-9Ri 'Confessional on David Miscavige' (Revised) of 1 Oct 94
RI-15i 'Recent Sessions with LRH on Miscavige' of 26 Oct 94
RI-23i 'More Proof on David Miscavige' of 17 Nov 1994
RI-29Ri 'Koos, LRH, Miscavige - the Truth' of 7 Dec 1994
RI-416i 'LRH "Being in harmony with Miscavige"' of 15 Dec 1995
RI-417i 'LRH Fused with Miscavige' of 19 Dec 1995
RI-543i 'Dictators' of 22 July 1994
RI-278i 'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard is "Right"' of 3 Oct 95
RI-278i-A'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard is more "Right"' 4 Oct 95
RI-279i 'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard Dominates Others' 4 Oct 95
RI-280i 'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard Thinks He Aids Survival' 5 Oct 95
RI-281i 'How LRH could make up for his tyranny (in Syracuse)' 7 Oct 95
RI-10i 'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994
RI-53i 'Past Life Criminals and Scn Ethics' of 29 July 1994
RI-269i 'How to Handle Irresponsible People' of 26 Sept 1995
RI-444i 'The Practice of "SP-declares"' of 5 Jan 1996
RI-58i 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95
RI-487i 'Dialogue: On Enemies and Hostility' of 20 Feb 1996
RI-535i '"An Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend" = INSANE' 10 Apr 96
RI-514i 'Confessionals and Blackmail -...IMPORTANT' 16 Mar 96
RI-541i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - I' 20 Apr 96
RI-542i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - II' 2 May 96
RI-288i 'The Main Evil Purpose' of 15 Oct 1995
RI-537i 'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996
RI-553i 'Decency and Honesty - Condition of Hiding' of 7 May 1996
RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996
These and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or
(with WWW-browser) at
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
(with ftp) at
thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
Back to the RI-Bulletin index.