11 May 1996
RI-557i 'The Truth about Napoleon (1810, France)'
from Ambassador for Mankind (Ron's Inspector)
Message # RI-557i for Internet
This being, Napoleon Bonaparte, the "Emperor" of France,
returned to us as David Miscavige,
once again to destroy Mankind.
This being left his body on 30 December 1994.
(see RI-54i 'Newsflash from ED INT Guillaume to Koos' 30 Dec 95)
Since that time he has been represented in public appearances
by a 'look-alike',
and the "power" of the Church of Scientology
was taken over by another anti-social person
called Ray Mithoff.
(see also RI-9Ri 'Confessional on David Miscavige' of 1 Oct 94)
Confessional session on Jutta Nolst Trenite, on 25 April 1996, 22:30 GMT,
ordered by Ambassador for Mankind.
(Reported per HCOPL 'Confessionals - Ethics Reports Required')
See RI-555i 'Confronting Mental Energy - Napoleon/Miscavige' 10 May 96
[Solo-Auditor:] What have you withheld
about the viewpoint of Napoleon?
[Jutta:] "'Only his viewpoint was valid',
that's what he enforced. LFBD
"Others' viewpoints were a threat to him, LFBD
they challenged his position, his 'rightness'. LFBD
"He couldn't have others' viewpoints and understand them.
LFBD LFBD's LFBD's
"Others were only interesting for him
in order to make them agree with him
- because they wanted his praise,
because they wanted his acknowledgement,
or they agreed out of propitiation, etc. - LFBD
or he was interested in others as targets,
to enforce on them agreement with him.
[Solo-Auditor:] What have you withheld
about the viewpoint of Napoleon?
"He couldn't 'leave people alone',
meaning, let them regulate their own affairs.
"He had to make rules and laws
in order to dominate people.
"He was afraid of people,
and he was afraid he would 'lose' them
if he wouldn't exert a strong control.
"He was afraid that people
would do anything to escape his control.
"But he couldn't just let them be, and make their own laws;
he thought that would certainly threaten his survival.
"He thought:
'If *I* do not dominate them, THEY will dominate ME.'
[Solo-Auditor:] What have you withheld
about the viewpoint of Napoleon?
"Any other viewpoint than his
was for him equal to an opposing viewpoint
and a threat to him. LFBD
"And he used to express disagreement with his viewpoint,
by covert hostility or outright anger.
LFBD's-F/Nind
Jutta Nolst Trenite"
Total session time: 00:45 min
Confessional session on Jutta Nolst Trenite, on 26 April 1996, 08:20 GMT,
ordered by Ambassador for Mankind.
(Reported per HCOPL 'Confessionals - Ethics Reports Required')
[Solo-Auditor:] What ELSE have you withheld
about the viewpoint of Napoleon?
"Napoleon didn't consider anyone whom he was aligned with,
as A FRIEND OR ALLY,
but rather as
a 'SUBDUED ENEMY', LFBD's
an overwhelmed enemy
whom Napoleon forced
to make a pact with France (meaning, with Napoleon)
and join forces and assist Napoleon;
or a potential enemy:
an ally to be suspicious of
- because he might only join forces with Napoleon
to have some advantage temporarily, LFBD
willing to fall into Napoleon's back
at the first occasion. LFBD's
"Napoleon: 'Nations, their leaders, people
have to be dominated in order to keep them in line.'
"Napoleon:
'A pact, a treaty is only as valid as it can be enforced.'
'There is no trust, honor, friendship, mutual intention
to bring about survival, that a treaty could be based on.'
[Solo-Auditor:] What else have you withheld
about the viewpoint of Napoleon?
"Napoleon:
'Survival is only what I CONSIDER survival for me.'
'Survival is what helps me to destroy.'
'Survival is what helps my evil intentions
to destroy life, people, nations.' LFBD
'Survival is what helps me to dominate others
and win over others.' LFBD
'Survival is what gives me power to dominate others.'
[Solo-Auditor:] What else have you withheld
about the viewpoint of Napoleon? LFBD's LFBD's
"Napoleon considered that
nobody would freely join him
out of appreciation for him or liking for him and his goals.
"(And in this he was right,
as his goals were destructive
and only Suppressive Persons wanted to join him 'freely',
- and even this was not freely but compulsive,
as Suppressive Persons have forfeited their power of choice,
and have made the decision to be evil.)
"So:
Napoleon considered that
nobody would freely join him
out of appreciation for him
or liking for him and his goals. LFBD
"So he pretended to have survival goals,
goals which people would like to work for,
contribute to, achieve.
"And to make sure that people really followed him
and that he could control them,
he passed laws and obliged people to follow them
and put people in charge to enforce the laws. LFBD
"His 'business' was war and domination, was fighting, LFBD
and he felt most 'alive' and most 'himself'
when he could lead some armies into a battle
and command the fighting forces LFBD
and enforce his viewpoint in this way
(when he was winning the battle).
"He didn't mind, that by this
he established only an ENFORCED agreement
with other nations and their leaders (out of overwhelm) LFBD
which could fall to pieces any moment
when the threat and control from his side
would be diminished. LFBD
"He didn't mind LFBD
to establish enforced agreement,
as long as he could control.
It allowed him to control,
and he didn't believe in any other agreement.
(An agreement of people who are responsible
and cared for survival). LFBD's
[Solo-Auditor:] What else have you withheld
about he viewpoint of Napoleon? LFBD's
"WORKING WITH (basing his actions and decisions on)
the survival intentions of others,
was not real for Napoleon.
"What he did was: LFBD
Exploiting the survival intentions of others,
by pretending to others
that he ALSO had survival intentions,
and WANTED to take responsibility LFBD
for the survival intentions of others.
"This was his 'PR campaign' [making himself look good]
and this was his betrayal.
LFBD's LFBD's LFBD's-F/Nind
Jutta Nolst Trenite"
Total session hours: 01:34 min
Confessional session on Jutta Nolst Trenite, on 26 April 1996, 12:25 GMT,
ordered by Ambassador for Mankind.
(Reported per HCOPL 'Confessionals - Ethics Reports Required')
[Solo-Auditor:] What have you done
with the viewpoint of Napoleon?
"I have helped Napoleon in his 'PR Campaign'.
"(Any appearance of Napoleon was a PR Campaign:
'Trust me that I have good intentions for you!'
'Trust me, it is SURVIVAL for you to follow me,
to let yourself be dominated by me'.)
"I have put this lie out about Napoleon, too.
I have reinforced his presence.
"I [as Marie-Louise of Austria, married to Napoleon
(see RI-555i 'Confronting Mental Energy - Napoleon...' 10 May 96)]
have put out to people:
'It is true what Napoleon wants to make you believe'.
"I have pretended to others about Napoleon's good intentions
(that Napoleon would have good intentions).
[Solo-Auditor:] What have you done
with the viewpoint of Napoleon?
"His viewpoint was:
'Survival is what gives me power to dominate others'.
"I gave him power to dominate others.
"To be recognized by an ancient, 'honorable' ruling house
- Austria - through marriage,
gave Napoleon power,
demonstrated that his demands are fulfilled, even without war,
demonstrated that he was accepted
as equal to those, like Franz I, who were Emperors by heredity.
(It was supposed to make a good impression
on the French population.)
"That he got a son finally from me,
was supposed to give the French population
a feeling of the continuation of Napoleon's Empire
and stability,
and was supposed to be a warning
to all who wanted Napoleon gone,
and a threat
to those who thought to overwhelm Napoleon.
"No, with a son he was 'eternal'
and somebody to count with 'from now on forever'. LFBD
"I helped Napoleon to put this viewpoint out,
and the reality, the fact,
which was supposed to give him power to dominate others.
[Solo-Auditor:] What have you done
with the viewpoint of Napoleon?
"Napoleon had the viewpoint
that nobody would join him out of appreciation or liking.
"I - in propitiation -
tried to assure him that I was there, after initial resistance,
out of liking and appreciation for him.
"That is, I tried to UNDO his - actually correct - viewpoint
that nobody appreciated or liked him.
"I tried to tell Napoleon
that I, and certainly also other people,
do NOT only consider him likable
because he is enforcing such a pretense,
and
I wanted to make him believe
that I appreciate HIM truly,
and
I wanted to achieve by it
that he would NOT want to control ME.
"I validated the viewpoint of Napoleon.
"I believed (also only as my pretense)
his pretenses of having good intentions.
"I killed my awareness of the truth about Napoleon,
I tried to kill others' awareness
about the TRUTH about Napoleon:
the truth that he was a
dangerous, destructive suppressive being,
who shouldn't be trusted or contributed to in any way, LFBD
- which was my original viewpoint about Napoleon,
before I forced myself to not know about it. LF
[Solo-Auditor:] What have you done
with the viewpoint of Napoleon?
"I have also tried to control people,
considering that
'they wouldn't by themselves have survival intentions'.
"I have done it this lifetime
when I tried to 'oblige' people to buy from me:
">Survival is
the willingness to
overwhelm, and 'not-is', invalidate
someone's self-determinism,
and assume - for the purpose of justification -
that people don't know what they want
and only follow their 'bank' [reactive mind],
and need somebody to control their bank.<
"This is the kind of Babsi Weber (overt) selling:
>People by themselves wouldn't do anything survival<. LFBD
(see RI-92i 'Worse than Napoleon - Josephine de Beau...' 30 Jan 95)
"And further:
>People have to be TOLD what is survival,
they don't know that,
and thus, their viewpoint is not valid.<
[Solo-Auditor:] What have you done
with the viewpoint of Napoleon?
"I have allowed Napoleon
to enforce his viewpoint on others and on me.
"I have allowed Napoleon
to enforce his viewpoint on my son,
that is:
to indoctrinate my son to hold a similar viewpoint,
as a 'successful viewpoint'.
">Survival is:
what gives me power to dominate others,
armies, title, authoritarian position.<
(He [the son] had 'learned' that already at the age of two.)
"And >[survival is] NOT understanding.<
"But UPS = Understanding IS Power towards Survival.
LFBD-F/Nind
Jutta Nolst Trenite"
Total session hours: 02:04 min
(The abbreviations F(Fall) LFBD(Long Fall Blow Down) and
F/N(Floating Needle) describe reactions on the E-meter,
indicating mental charge (F, LFBD), and release of charge
completed (F/N).
"LFBD-F/N" = truth found out. "ind" = indicated to the person.)
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind
Copyright 1996 by Koos Nolst Trenite
references:
RI-555i 'Confronting Mental Energy - Napoleon/Miscavige' 10 May 96
RI-40i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - EP' of 19 Dec 94
RI-41i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - I' of 18 Dec 94
RI-42i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - II' of 18 Dec 94
RI-43i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - III' 16 Dec 1994
RI-44i 'The Miscavige-97-Bi-Yrs-Ago-Inc - IV' of 15 Dec 94
RI-9Ri 'Confessional on David Miscavige' (Revised) of 1 Oct 94
RI-15i 'Recent Sessions with LRH on Miscavige' of 26 Oct 94
RI-23i 'More Proof on David Miscavige' of 17 Nov 1994
RI-29Ri 'Koos, LRH, Miscavige - the Truth' of 7 Dec 1994
RI-92i 'Worse than Napoleon - Josephine de Beauharnais' of 30 Jan 95
RI-416i 'LRH "Being in harmony with Miscavige"' of 15 Dec 1995
RI-417i 'LRH Fused with Miscavige' of 19 Dec 1995
RI-543i 'Dictators' of 22 July 1994
RI-278i 'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard is "Right"' of 3 Oct 95
RI-278i-A'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard is more "Right"' 4 Oct 95
RI-279i 'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard Dominates Others' 4 Oct 95
RI-280i 'How Tyrant L. Ron Hubbard Thinks He Aids Survival' 5 Oct 95
RI-281i 'How LRH could make up for his tyranny (in Syracuse)' 7 Oct 95
RI-10i 'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994
RI-53i 'Past Life Criminals and Scn Ethics' of 29 July 1994
RI-269i 'How to Handle Irresponsible People' of 26 Sept 1995
RI-444i 'The Practice of "SP-declares"' of 5 Jan 1996
RI-58i 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95
RI-487i 'Dialogue: On Enemies and Hostility' of 20 Feb 1996
RI-535i '"An Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend" = INSANE' 10 Apr 96
RI-514i 'Confessionals and Blackmail -...IMPORTANT' 16 Mar 96
RI-541i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - I' 20 Apr 96
RI-542i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - II' 2 May 96
RI-288i 'The Main Evil Purpose' of 15 Oct 1995
RI-537i 'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996
RI-553i 'Decency and Honesty - Condition of Hiding' of 7 May 1996
RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996
These and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or
(with WWW-browser) at
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
(with ftp) at
thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
Back to the RI-Bulletin index.