14 June 1997


    RI-568i  'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - Part IV'


from Ambassador for Mankind


Message # RI-568i for Internet




"The meanest thing you can do to a person, to any person,
  is NOT TO FIND OUT his non-survival acts.
 But it is 'normal' social practice
  to claim and do to people exactly the opposite."


"The answer is simple and very, very, very basic:
  People like to make it
   seem right - more or less, or completely -
    that they did something that was non-survival."

                        'Ambassador for Mankind'




You will need an UNDERSTANDING of Part I, II and III of
 the Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure,
   in order to do the steps of the Confession.


The Confessional questions are:


Step 1. "WHICH NON-SURVIVAL ACT OF YOURS
         WOULD YOU LIKE TO CONFESS, NOW?"


Step 2. "TELL ME ABOUT THAT ACT OF YOURS
         TILL YOU YOURSELF ARE SATISFIED WITH
         DESCRIBING IT TO ME AS A NON-SURVIVAL ACT."

        Repeat step two till satisfaction of
         both confessant [person who confesses]
          and confessor [person guiding and listening to the Confession].
        Back to step one if no satisfaction.


Step 3.P (3.Preliminary)
        "IF THIS IS NOT ONE PARTICULAR TIME OR ONE PARTICULAR INCIDENT,
         THEN TELL ME THE ONE TIME OR THE ONE INCIDENT
         THAT YOU ARE NOW MOST INTERESTED IN CONFESSING ABOUT."

        Again, till satisfaction.
         If no satisfaction, go back to step one.



These steps, step one, two and three Preliminary,
 are extensively described
  in the previous issues (Part I, II and III).



Step three consists of two questions:


Step 3. A. "WHO NEARLY FOUND OUT ABOUT
            THIS NON-SURVIVAL ACT OF YOURS?

        B. "WHAT DID THIS PERSON DO
            TO MAKE YOU FEEL THAT HE KNEW OR
            TO MAKE YOU WONDER WHETHER HE KNEW?"

        C. Repeat 3A, 3B, 3A, 3B, etc.
            till a Release occurs for the confessant.


Step 4. "HOW (ELSE) DID YOU JUSTIFY THIS NON-SURVIVAL ACT?"

         Repeat till a Release occurs.




NEARLY FOUND OUT

The results for the confessant of doing step three
 seem miracle and magic.

But the mechanism is easy to understand:

Whenever someone
 NEARLY finds out about his non-survival act,
  he creates some confusion in himself
   in order to oppose his NATURAL inclination (and hidden desire)
    that his act IS found out.

The meanest thing you can do to a person, to any person,
 is NOT TO FIND OUT his non-survival acts.

But it is 'normal' social practice
 to claim and do to people exactly the opposite
  and even
 to claim that "that is how a friend behaves".
 (see also USP-028 'Tact and diplomacy in "handling" a Suppressive' 31 Jan 94
           http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/usp-028.htm)

The non-survival act
 has already a lot of confusion in it,
  which should - with the next step, step four - become unconfused.

But each time
 that his non-survival act is
  NEARLY found out,
   he creates some confusion on top of it.


The non-survival act
  becomes more and more clouded and buried in confusion,
  and
 he tends to become very irrational about what he did -
  he becomes more and more irrational and confused
   about an already irrational and confused non-survival act
    that he once committed.


He starts to irrationally blame and attack
 others - who nearly found out -
  for "forcing" him to lie,
  for "making" him confused,
 actually
  for causing him to be confused about his basic desire
   not to hide his non-survival act anymore.


Therefore you ask
   "WHO ALMOST FOUND OUT ABOUT
     THIS NON-SURVIVAL ACT OF YOURS?"
  and then
   "What did this person do
     to make you feel that he knew or
     to make you wonder whether he knew?"

This gets off the layers of piled-up confusion
 - exactly that extra confusion
    that is making it too hard to unconfuse
     the actual non-survival act itself
      which is all the time 'nearly found out'.


It can be a lot of work, to do step three,
 but it is also a lot of fun,
  both for the confessant who confesses
  and for the confessor who hears the Confession.




JUSTIFIED IT HOW?

When both you and the person you are doing this Confessional with
 have finished laughing your heads off
  about all the silly things that came up in the answers,
    you do the next and last step, step four.



Step 4. "HOW (ELSE) DID YOU JUSTIFY THIS NON-SURVIVAL ACT?"

         Repeat till a Release occurs.

         As in step three,
          you get an answer and
          you acknowledge the answer
           (the answers can be quite silly or quite horrible,
             but you, as confessor taking the Confession from the confessant,
              keep a straight face and just acknowledge the answer.
            You don't accuse him of anything,
            you don't tell him
             how silly or how incomprehensibly stupid or evil he was,
              no matter what his answers are.)

         You keep this up, on step four:
          Ask the question,
           get one or several answers,
           acknowledge the answer(s).
          Ask the question,
           get one or several answers,
           acknowledge the answer(s).
          Etc.


Now WHY do you ask this question?

The answer is simple and very, very, very basic:
 People like to make it
  seem right - more or less, or completely -
   that they did something that was non-survival.

You have to know - or believe me - that
  people basically know
   what is a survival act and
   what is a non-survival act,
     no matter how confused they may seem and act on the subject.


So any self-realization course or therapy,
 that
   - no matter how "great" and "powerful" it makes you,
      as the courses offered by Tony Robbins, Alan C. Walter,
       Harry Palmer or Werner Erhardt want to convince you that they do -
  does NOT build on
   survival acts and non-survival acts, and that
  does proceed in a manner of therapy and training or meditation
   in which one is NOT required to see and at least partly dissolve
    the problems that others have with others and
     that others have with themselves,
       (see RI-857i-AS 'Telepathy Course - the Processes - Summary' 2 June 97
            http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/ri-857as.htm)
  will either
    not improve you very much,
  or, when it does indeed make you "great and powerful",
    it will make you into a
     seemingly powerful,
     but self-centered, dominating type
      that derives "power" and influence
       from actually betraying those 'below him',
        in some way and disguise.
      (see RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
           http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/ri-602i.htm)




TRUE NATURE OF A BEING

Step 4. is "HOW (ELSE) DID YOU JUSTIFY
            THIS NON-SURVIVAL ACT OF YOURS?"

This is a very, very basic question.

It is so close to the actual and true nature of a being,
 that it is great fun to answer (and to ask) such a question,
   especially when repeated till a Release occurs.

Even in social life,
 it is a MARVELOUS question to ask someone
  - if you know what you are doing
     (if you know what the non-survival act is).
You spot a non-survival act,
 and you ask the person
   'How did you justify it?' or
   'How is it right what you did?'.

They will almost always answer.

If you ask a rather alive, aware and responsible person,
 he will probably burst out in laughter
  and thank you for giving him a great question!

And that is step four.




BACK IN COMMAND OF HIMSELF

It brings a person back in command of himself
 as regards that non-survival act.

And
 if you know - or can believe me -
  that all criminality stems from
   people not being in command of
    themselves, their actions and their thoughts,
  then you can appreciate this very much.
    (see also RI-750i  'Crimes are not motivated by money' of 30 Nov 1996
              http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/ri-750i.htm)

It is a most magical question (step four), and
 if the claim of my friend and enemy L. Ron Hubbard
  that he devised the question, is true,
    then I must acknowledge him for that.




OPTIONAL EXTRA STEP

Now, if you still want to undo more confusion
 of that particular non-survival act,
  you do

Step 4. A. "HOW (ELSE) DID ANOTHER OR OTHERS
            JUSTIFY THIS NON-SURVIVAL ACT OF YOURS?"

            and repeat that till a Release occurs.


That's especially if you want to be extra thorough
 on a non-survival act which others have strongly justified FOR him
  - such as addictions, compulsions, stupidities,
     sexual perversions, diseases, etc. etc.
       according to what the society at a particular time
        considers justified aberrations.




NEXT NON-SURVIVAL ACT

You continue the Correct and Joyful Confessional
 by taking up step one again,
  as I described in
     RI-541i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - Part I'
      of 20 Apr 1996, updated 14 June 1997
      (http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/ri-541i.htm)
     RI-542i  'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - Part II'
      of 2 May 1996, updated 14 June 1997
      (http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/ri-542i.htm)
     RI-545i  'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - Part III'
      of 20 May 1996, updated 14 June 1997
      (http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/ri-545i.htm).



Have lots of fun!


To end with,
 I still would like to put your attention on
    RI-514Ri 'Confessionals and Blackmail - VERY IMPORTANT' of 16 Mar 1996
    (http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/ri-514i.htm).



Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind

Copyright 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite



Personal Web-page:
  http://ArtOrg.com

Personal Web-Library:
  http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/

Library Search Engine:
  http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/search.html



References (available at the Library "http://Art-Org.com"):

  (some Bulletins with Definitions for life)

  RI-602i   'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
  RI-629i   'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
  RI-631i   'Definition of "Woman"' of 12 July 1996

  RI-714i   'State of Sanity, Definition of' of 24 Oct 1996

  RI-797i   'A lively definition of "money"' of 21 Feb 1997
  RI-735i   '"Leadership" - Definition of Third Party' of 12 Nov 1996

  RI-710i   'A Protective Shell - Anchorpoints used wrongly' of 16 Oct 1996
  RI-807Si  '"Operating Thetan" defined' of 24 Mar 1997

  The 'Understanding Suppression Series'
   (Definitions of 'Suppressive Person')
   http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/usp.htm


  (about the Telepathy Course)

  RI-771i  'Use of Telepathy' of 4 Jan 1997
  RI-881i  'Basics of Telepathy - Vital Data about You' of 11 June 1997
  RI-857i  'Telepathy - Telepathic Auditor Training Course' of 29 May 1997
  RI-857i-AS 'Telepathy Course - the Processes - Summary' of 2 June 1997


  (about using and understanding the E-meter)

  RI-687i  'Notes on E-meter use and Solo-Auditing' of 4 Sept 96
  RI-648i  'Simplicity of E-meter use, by UNDERSTANDING it' 1 Aug 96
  RI-610i  'Understanding the E-meter, correctly' of 26 June 96


  (about the importance and use of Confessionals)

  RI-823i  'Truth, Justice, Sanity and Auditing - relationship' 7 Apr 97
  RI-752i  'Case Supervision, the correct basics' of 30 Nov 1996
  RI-010i  'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994

  RI-514Ri 'Confessionals and Blackmail - VERY IMPORTANT' 16 Mar 96
  RI-713i  'Handling Attacks Correctly - Space and Love' of 18 Oct 1996


  (some Bulletins on different types of Confession)

  RI-769Ri 'Restoring Aliveness Rundown, SUPER POWER - Part I' 30 Dec 96
  RI-795i  'Restoring Aliveness Rundown, SUPER POWER - Part II' 20 Feb 97

  RI-553i  'Decency and Honesty - Condition of Hiding' 7 May 96

  RI-702i  '"Word Clearing" is Concept Clearing' of 25 Sept 1996
  RI-382i  'Gradients and Low Conditions' of 2 Nov 1995

  RI-408i  'Emotional Charge about LRH - handling' of 13 Dec 95

  RI-668i   'COMPLETE Scientology Data for Everyone, FOR FREE' 16 Aug 96
  RI-668i-A 'COMPLETE Scientology Data FOR FREE - For AOL-users' 18 Aug 96

  RI-770i  '[ARCX's at Key-outs]' of 29 Nov 1996
  RI-617i  'Controlling Evil Intentions, how' of 28 June 1996


  (about RI-Bulletins)

  RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
  RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
               Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996

These and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or

    at the Library of Koos' writings on
         http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/

    or at the Archives at
         ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI



Back to the RI-Bulletin index.