1 December 1996
                                              issued 11 Dec 1996


         RI-750i  'Crimes are not motivated by money'


from Ambassador for Mankind


Message # RI-750i for Internet




You may have been told
 that crime is motivated
  by the desire to have money.



This is a very superficial view,
 and actually a refusal to look at the crime.

But criminals themselves are the ones
 who try to promote this false idea.



Ninety-eight percent of the population
 would not resort to crime if they needed money.

They simply would do a job that is valuable to others, and
 they would ask for money in return.

But criminals do not want
 that their actual true intentions are looked at.


So they promote the idea
  that "they have to be criminal",
  that "they were forced to be a criminal".
 And
  you are supposed to accept this about them.
   They want that you believe this.


But the motivation of a bank robber
 is NOT
   to get money,
 it IS
   to destroy the society, and
   to make nothing of those who DO valuable work.


Somebody told me
  that it would require courage to rob a bank.
 But the bank robber is too cowardly
  simply to do some work that contributes to others!



The motivation of a whore
 is not
   to get money,
 but
   to destroy families and
   to degrade themselves and others
    through the use of sex and intentional lies.

They sell
  'I will degrade you and you will degrade me,
    and
   we both will agree
    that it is impossible to have a
     decent and honest relation with people.'


The motivation of a drug-dealer
 is not
   to get money,
 but
   to degrade people,
   to make them dependent and irresponsible,
   to show them that they can't be strong and
   to show them that they have to succumb to suppression.


The motivation
 of the current Management of the Church of Scientology
  is not
    money,
  but
    to dominate people and to control them.


Their actions to keep parts of Scientology secret
 is not
   to prevent people from seeing data
    that might not be real to them,
 but
   to scare Scientologists into submission, and
   to dominate them into
    agreeing to be dominated "for their own good" and into
    forcing the domination upon others.


The most violent and criminal actions
  of the Religion Technology Center and
  of the Office of Special Affairs
   in trying to defend a monopoly
     are not
      "to prevent people
        from getting 'unauthorized' Scientology",
     but
       to dominate and control everybody
        who tries to make himself
          more able and
          more aware and
          more responsible.

This is why
 the Hubbard Church of Scientology
  is a Mafia-Church.



To say
 that they (the Hubbard Organizations) just want money,
  - as I recently read in a German finance magazine,
      called "Kapitalforum", of 1 Sept 1996 -
    and
 that they are only somewhat stupid
  in slaughtering
   the cows (members of the Church of Scientology)
    that they milk,
 is
  entirely missing the truth
   which is that
     the actual true motivation
      of the Church of Hubbard-Scientology
       is
        to DOMINATE the whole society of Earth,
          in particular
             by their control and domination
              of companies and governments
              through their
               World Institute of Scientology Enterprises (WISE).

It is a criminal and harmful purpose,
 because
  the purpose is
     to achieve a dictatorship, a tyranny, a fascism,
      led
       by the International Management of the Hubbard Church,
        through their continental and local organizations.

It is a criminal and harmful purpose,
 but
  it is very appealing to people
    'finally to have peace and quiet and
      all of their problems solved for them,
        by the "perfect" State
        with the "perfect" population
        under the "perfect" leaders.'
    (see RI-14i  'SPs in Scientology's Safe Space' of 23 Oct 1994
         RI-543i  'Dictators' of 22 July 1994, issued 2 May 1996)

This is what was appealing about Fascism
 to two thirds of the German population,
 that is,
  as long as they were not informed about
   what the ACTUAL intentions of the fascists were and
   what their true behind-the-scenes actions and crimes were.
    (see RI-71i  'How Hitler trapped the German People' of 22 Jan 1995)

They were willing to sacrifice some of their freedoms
 and friends and possessions
  to achieve
    this "perfect State"
    with a "perfect" population
    under "perfect" leaders.

BUT THEY WANTED ALL THAT
 IN ORDER NOT TO HAVE TO LOOK FOR THEMSELVES.


They only wanted reassurance
 that "all is in good hands".


Scientology - Hubbard Scientology, that is -
 is in EXTREMELY EVIL HANDS,
  and
   that has nothing at all to do
    with the desire to have money.

They want to dominate, to control people,
 which is evil - extremely evil -
  but
   a defense against such evil is rare,
    in the history of this planet.





The desire to acquire and to have possessions
 is NOT at all a criminal and harmful purpose!
  On the contrary!




A person who has serious debts
 does not at all have to resort to crime
  to handle his situation.

The relationship
 between money and crime
  is entirely artificial.


It is an artificial idea that is
 created and promoted by criminals
  in order to cover up their intentions
    to destroy individuals and
    to destroy the society.

These criminals say:
   "Well, we want to acquire money.
    You also want to acquire money.
     You happen to do it within the limits of the laws.
     That's the only difference.
       If the laws were different,
         then you also might be criminals,
         or we, then, might not be criminals."

You see that that is entirely false,
 because
   the purpose of criminals is
    to destroy individuals and the society,
 and
   your purpose is
    to help and to contribute to individuals, and
    to improve and to contribute to the society.



It is further an artificial idea
 kept up
  in order to explain the failure and unwillingness
   of crime-fighters,
   of policemen and
   of others, as well,
    to confront and recognize
     the fact
      that criminals DO have intentions
        to destroy individuals and
        to destroy the society,
    and
   in order to explain their (crime-fighter's) refusal
    to perceive
     HOW criminals
      are covering up their actual motives.

The only requirement
 for something to be an explanation
  is
   that it is accepted as an explanation, and
   that the curiosity of the inquirer is satisfied.
  An explanation is not necessarily connected with truth at all.




All of the insane conquerors, kings and emperors
  who were so-called
    "motivated by acquiring territory and possession"
 did not really have that motivation at all,
  but
   USED that as a justification, and
   SAID that they had that motivation
    in order to cover up the fact
      that their actual motivation was
       to destroy individuals and
       to destroy other societies and other groups, and
    in order to cover up
      that their actual intention was
       to dominate as many people as they could, and
       to make them unhappy, and
       to destroy
           their activities and
           their interests and
           their occupations and
           their families, and
       to make them into slaves,
        and so on.

But they (the conquerors) considered it a nice trick
  to cover it up by saying
   that they just wanted to have
     more possessions and
     more territory and
     more "Lebensraum", habitat, living-space.

That was more acceptable
 than telling their friends
  that
   they just wanted
    to destroy people and
    to dominate people and
    to enslave people.

It was a much more of an acceptable explanation,
 to tell their friends:
   "We are entitled to have this territory."
   "We must get the contributions, and the respect due to us."



No, no,
 the way you get more territory and more possessions
  is by
    CARING for more people,
    CARING for more territory,
    CARING for more activities of people,
  and NOT
    by crime!
  (see RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996)




Now, you hear all the time from the news media
 that so-and-so was murdered
   because his murderer owed him ten thousand dollars.

And the police-guys say to the press:
  "This criminal was obviously motivated by money."

Well, that's making it very, very easy on themselves, isn't it?
 And they tell you this false information.

They don't say
 that almost all people
  who owe another person ten thousand dollars
    do quite different things to satisfy their creditors!

The actual motivation of the "money-motivated" criminal was
  a pure and simple intention
   to destroy the creditor,
    and
 that the criminal owed money to the creditor
  was an acceptable justification
   for not mentioning - nor even looking at -
    the true motive for murder.



Another "motive" for crime
 is supposed to be
   'rejected love'
  or
   a spouse refusing to return attention and sex, and
    intentionally giving it to someone else instead.

And this is then supposed to be
 a "motive" for murdering one's spouse.

The actual motive is, of course,
  to destroy the spouse completely and
  to deny the spouse any further opportunity
     to give attention and sex to another, and
  to deny the spouse's attention
     to those who were receiving it or
      who might receive it in the future.



You see, if you state the ACTUAL motive,
 then you open the way
   to preventing or remedying the crime, or
   to diminishing the risk of the crime
     being repeated by the criminal on further victims.




Let's take another example:

Saddam Hussein, the dictator of Iraq,
 invades Kuwait
   with the claimed motive
    to acquire more wealth, and more oil.
  But his country is supposed to be
   one of the richest in oil in the world.

"Yes, but he wanted a harbor in order to export his oil."
   But he already has a pipeline from his country
    directly to the Mediterranean Sea!

The actual purposes of Saddam Hussein
 are now quite well shown and understood.

His intentions are
  to destroy his own country and its population, and
  to poison the soil of Kuwait and
  to throw deadly gas-bombs on all of the countries around him.

This is not motivated by money at all.

Quite the contrary.
  He spent billions of dollars
    to buy his war-rockets,
     plus a nuclear plant and laboratories
      to try and manufacture nuclear weapons, and
  he spent more billions of dollars
   to build factories
    for poisonous gas and
    for the weapons to shoot it
      at the populations of the surrounding countries.


Even the American President at the time, George Bush,
  understood this,
   as published on 1 December 1996
    in the 'Parade Magazine' of American Sunday newspapers:
        "Does one bully of a country move in on its neighbor,
          and [should] the world sit by and say that's fine?"

   (With thanks to one of my American Correspondents
     who pointed out this publication to me. - Koos)



But if Henry Kissinger,
  or a former peanut-farmer
   who became President of the United States,
 would come along,
  he would want
    a 'balance of power' in the Gulf-area,
     so that the Arabs don't ask for
      too high a price for their oil.

And they would spread the idea
 that Hussein is only in it "for the money".

They might even offer him money, you know!
  So that he would stop his aggression.
 Well,
  he would take the money, sure,
   but he would use it to "aggress" more, to attack more.


No, Saddam Hussein is not at all in it for the money.
 He is in it
   for the total destruction
     of the population of his own country, and
   for the destruction
     of the population of the neighboring countries.


But Mr. Henry Kissinger, and his former boss Nixon,
   if I understand them correctly,
 would want to support Hussein
   in order to create a "balance of power" in the Gulf-area
    so that the Americans would not have to pay
     the other Arabs too high a price for their fuel.

"The only way
  to ensure the loyalty of your friends
    (the Saudi-Arabians and the Kuwaitis)
 is
  to betray them by supporting their enemies
   (the Iraqis and Iranians)",
       Kissinger and Nixon were trying to preach.
  What madmen!




Well, well,
 "we are all money-motivated",
    they are trying to preach.


Which is as far from the truth as you can get.




Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind

Copyright 1996 by Koos Nolst Trenite


Personal Web-page:
  http://ArtOrg.com


References:

- Bulletins about Leadership

  RI-705i  'Society Resurgence, Use of Rules' of 9 Oct 1996

  RI-602i  'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
  RI-535i  '"An Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend" = INSANE' 10 Apr 96

  RI-514i  'Confessionals and Blackmail - VERY IMPORTANT' 16 Mar 96
  RI-553i  'Decency and Honesty - Condition of Hiding' 7 May 96
  RI-617i  'Controlling Evil Intentions, how' of 28 June 1996


- Bulletins about History:

  RI-664i  'Recommended History Books' of 12 Aug 1996
  RI-636i  'Philipp II of Spain's "Standard Faith"' 16 July 1996
  RI-71i   'How Hitler trapped the German People' of 22 Jan 95

  RI-691i  'Admiral Canaris Biographies, Recommended' of 11 Sept 1996
  RI-603i  'Capitalist - Industrialist - Employee' of 21 Oct 95
  RI-267i  'Omitted Data on Waging and Ending Wars' of 13 Sept 95

  RI-288i  'The Main Evil Purpose' of 15 Oct 1995
  RI-543i  'Dictators' of 22 July 1994, issued 2 May 1996


- Bulletins about handling attacks and evil:

  RI-713i  'Handling Attacks Correctly - Space and Love' 18 Oct 1996

  RI-10i   'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994
  RI-58Ri  'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95

  RI-646i  'FACING those who are mean or dishonest' of 31 July 1996
  RI-487i  'Dialogue: On Enemies and Hostility' of 20 Feb 1996


- Some Bulletins about Religion

  RI-260i  'Comparative Religion' of 19 Aug 1995
  RI-379Ri 'Religious Tolerance' of 1 Nov 1995
  RI-738i  'Christianity - Love, and Guilt solved' of 17 Nov 1996


- Some Bulletins about How to Handle and Look at People

  RI-592i  'How To Look At People' of 5 June 1996
  RI-734i  'Orienting Children' of 13 Nov 1996
  RI-631i  'Definition of "Woman"' of 12 July 1996

  RI-629i  'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
  RI-235i  'Handling people with Understanding' of 14 July 1995

  RI-242Ri 'Being There - Freedom to Act' of 22 July 1995
  RI-274i  'Setting Own Awareness-Level - Use of Vital Data' of 8 Oct 95


- Some Bulletins about Sanity

  RI-449i  'A Rule For Freedom' of 14 Jan 1996
  RI-714i  'State of Sanity, Definition of' of 24 Oct 1996
  RI-537i  'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996


- Bulletins about the evil in the Church of Scientology

  RI-732i  'The Evil in L. Ron Hubbard's Scientology Philosophy' 10 Nov 1996
  RI-661i  'Domination by L. Ron Hubbard understood' of 4 Aug 1996


  RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
  RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
               Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996

These and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or

    (with WWW-browser) at
       ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
    (with ftp) at
       thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI