12 December 1996


       RI-759i  'Understanding a Typical Marriage Problem'


from Ambassador for Mankind


Message # RI-759i for Internet



(As seen from the viewpoint of a lively husband,
   but it equally could be the other way around, of course,
    when the wife is the lively partner in the marriage.)




You accepted her 'as she is'
  when you married her,
   and
 you accepted the way she behaved
  the years after the wedding,
   and
 you even accepted her 'as she is'
  already before the wedding.

And now,
 you suddenly don't accept the way she is,
   even though SHE hasn't changed.


You broke the agreement
 if you now
   don't want to accept anymore the way she is,
   but want to change her
   or want to change the conditions in your relationship.


This is the kind of stuff
 that is being thrown at you - without words -
   by your wife and
   by your family and
   by your friends.

And as soon as you are going to actually voice
  that you want conditions changed, and
  that you want her to change,
    you will also hear them actually VOICE these thoughts.


They are all tremendous, tremendous lies -
 which they will voice.

But
 these are socially very, very acceptable lies, and
 they are used very strongly and frequently,
   and
  probably any average employee-type, protect-me-type individual
    will wholeheartedly agree with them.



Now, what is the truth about all this?


The truth about all this is
  that you did NOT accept her at all 'AS SHE IS',
    not before the wedding,
    not at the wedding, and
    not during the marriage.



What DID you accept?

You accepted
  not to look at the majority of her intentions, and you accepted
  not to look at her past, and you accepted
  not to look at her actual intentions towards you, and you accepted
  not to look at what she will do
   in the future
     to you,
     to your friends,
     to your children and
     to your job.

But
 she tries to enforce on you
  that you did accept HER,
    before the wedding,
    during the wedding, and
    during the marriage, and
  that you DID accept her as she is.

And you say
  "Yes, that's true,
    all the time
     I accepted her 'as she is',
     I did not protest and
     I did not oppose
        her destructive intentions.


The truth is - what you accepted is -
  that you accepted NOT to look at her,
    - which was and is in accordance with her wishes, by the way.


And all the time
   you did not at all ACCEPT her as she was,
 but
   you accepted her as she was NOT.
     (see RI-629i 'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 96
           [http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/ri-630i.htm ])
     (see also RI-757i 'Making a violent psychotic saner' of 11 Dec 96
          on accepting a person as he is.
           [http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/ri-757i.htm ])


Now, for some reason or another,
  you start
   to look a bit more closely
    at the intentions of your wife,
      or
 for some reason or another,
  your agreement with her and with others
   about NOT looking at her intentions
     is diminished.


And now she starts the accusation
  that YOU have changed and
  that therefore YOU are the one
    who is destroying the marriage,
  because
    "All went fine in the marriage up to now,
      AND SHE DIDN'T CHANGE."

And she will invite family, friends and neighbors
  to testify for her
     that SHE didn't change.


Well, what you changed
  was not your behavior,
 but rather
  you diminished your agreement with her
   that you will not look at her intentions.


She will present that
  to the court of invited family, friends and neighbors
 as evidence
  of your having developed a bad character
   - which you did not have
       when she married you, and
     which you also didn't have
       during the marriage,
     but which you only now have 'suddenly developed'.



You see,
 she considers your behavior anti-social.


She does not want her intentions looked at.
She does not want her actions looked at.
She does not want her past looked at.

She does not even want to look at her own intentions,
 nor at her own actions, and
she certainly doesn't want to look at her past actions.


You agreed with her,
  before the wedding and
  during the marriage,
  every day since and
  each day again and
  each minute that you were together,
    not to look
     at these things about her.

She considers that agreement - which she obtained from you -
  very survival for herself,
 because
   she was and is totally sure
    that anybody who does look at these things about her
      would not want to marry her or
      would not want to stay married to her.




Now, please understand this:

  By keeping you from looking at her, and
  by constantly keeping you to your agreement
    not to look at her,
   she considers
    SHE is
     keeping and saving and creating the marriage!

And she considers then
  that YOU - by starting to look at her -
    are wanting to destroy and are destroying the marriage.




Whichever way you turn it,
 it is always your fault, and
 it is always you
   who is destroying her and
   who is destroying the marriage.

She never gets the idea
  that it is her intentions and her actions
    (which are also motivated
      by her past actions and by her past intentions)
   that are continuously destroying
     the marriage and
     the aliveness of the members of the family,
 because
   she doesn't want to look at her intentions,
   she doesn't want to look at what she is doing and
   she doesn't want to look at what her intentions behind it are.



It's like
  asking a blind man what he sees.

He says,
  "I see a room and a chair, a brown chair,"
    (because he has learnt that all the chairs are brown)
  "and I see the sunshine outside, on the lawn."

And you ask the blind man,
  "Can you see these things?"
 and he says,
  "Sure! Do you think I am blind or something?
    I can even read and write and
    I can produce children and
    I can tell the difference between the songs
      of a nightingale and a blackbird.
    Can you?"
And you say,
   "No, I actually can't tell that difference."

And you write in your report,
   "This man is not blind.
     He even can tell very similar birds apart."

That's actually how you have been bullied by your wife
  into not looking at her ACTUAL condition,
  into not looking at her ACTUAL intentions.




It doesn't occur at all to your wife
  that SHE (with her life-suffocating intentions)
    is destroying the marriage.

And she can also very easily prove
 to the court of family, friends and neighbors
   that
    SHE is not destroying the marriage, but
   that
    SHE kept it there for five years.


And,
 - after you
    have appeared before this court several times and
    have heard the accusations -
and,
 - noticing
    that there was no attorney invited by your wife
     for YOUR defense -
and,
 - after you heard the verdict many times
     that she did and does everything
       to keep a marriage there, and
     that you changed and broke the agreement
      (to remind you:
        you agreed not to look at
          her intentions and
          her past and
        you agreed that she also does not herself
          have to look at her actions, intentions and past) -
 you admit defeat,
  and
 you accept the verdict on you -
  unanimously and repeatedly pronounced by the court:
     "YOU changed abruptly,
      SHE did everything to keep the marriage together.
      YOU have developed anti-social qualities
       - by wanting to look at things
           you're not supposed to look at, and
         by wanting to know things
          that you are not supposed to find out, and
         by the most horrible crime of all:
          Wanting from another that he
           actually looks
            at his own intentions and
            at his own actions."




This is what awaits you,
 should you decide
  to dissolve an insane and destructive marriage.


You might describe the problem
 as a number of opposing intentions in yourself:

        1. "I want to be more alive and to have more honesty."
    versus
        2. "I don't want to be accused of breaking my agreements,
             as I have indeed agreed with her
               to be dishonest to her and
               not to be alive with her."
    versus
        3. etc.





Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind

Copyright 1996 by Koos Nolst Trenite


Personal Web-page:
  http://ArtOrg.com


Personal Web-Library:
  http://Art-Org.com


References:

- Bulletins about Marriage and Family and Problems in Marriage

  RI-537i  'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996
  RI-629i  'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996

  RI-631i  'Definition of "Woman"' of 12 July 1996
  RI-734i  'Orienting Children' of 13 Nov 1996

  RI-713i  'Handling Attacks Correctly - Space and Love' 18 Oct 1996
  RI-219i  'People Refusing Marriage Counseling' 30 June 95
  RI-316Ri '(Mentions handling Betrayal in a Marriage)' 26 Oct 95

  RI-543i  'Dictators' of 22 July 1994, issued 2 May 1996
  RI-602i  'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996

  RI-689i  'Auditing a psychotic telepathically' of 7 Sept 1996
  RI-688i  'Handling parents - a psychotic mother' of 7 Sept 1996
  RI-697i  'Telepathic Auditing for my Father - On Friendships' of 17 Sept 96
  RI-698i  'Treat a Psychotic as a Psychotic (on my mother)' of 19 Sept 96


- Some Bulletins about How to Help and Look at People

  RI-592i  'How To Look At People' of 5 June 1996
  RI-235i  'Handling people with Understanding' of 14 July 1995

  RI-242Ri 'Being There - Freedom to Act' of 22 July 1995
  RI-274i  'Setting Own Awareness-Level - Use of Vital Data' of 8 Oct 95


- Some Bulletins about Society

  RI-705i  'Society Resurgence, Use of Rules' of 9 Oct 1996

  RI-267i  'Omitted Data on Waging and Ending Wars' of 13 Sept 95
  RI-603i  'Capitalist - Industrialist - Employee' of 21 Oct 95

  RI-664i  'Recommended History Books' of 12 Aug 1996
  RI-691i  'Admiral Canaris Biographies, Recommended' of 11 Sept 1996


- Some Bulletins about Art

  RI-019i  'Artists and Ethics' of 10 Sept 1992
  RI-704Ri 'Real Art is not hard to understand' of 30 Sept 1996
  RI-727Ri 'Van Gogh's "Starry Night"-painting' of 29 Oct 1996


- Some Bulletins about Helping Criminals

  RI-750i  'Crimes are not motivated by money' of 1 Dec 1996

  RI-058Ri 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95
  RI-487i  'Dialogue: On Enemies and Hostility' of 20 Feb 1996
  RI-535i  '"An Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend" = INSANE' of 10 Apr 1996

  RI-646i  'FACING those who are mean or dishonest' of 31 July 1996
  RI-262i  'Creating despite Suppressive Persons' of 20 Aug 1995


- Some Bulletins about Sanity

  RI-449i  'A Rule For Freedom' of 14 Jan 1996
  RI-714i  'State of Sanity, Definition of' of 24 Oct 1996
  RI-537i  'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996


- Some Bulletins about Religion

  RI-260i  'Comparative Religion' of 19 Aug 1995
  RI-379i  'Religious Tolerance' of 1 Nov 1995
  RI-738i  'Christianity - Love, and Guilt solved' of 17 Nov 1996


- Some Bulletins about Ambassador for Mankind

  RI-126Ri 'Koos Nolst Trenite - identity' of 29 Mar 1995
  RI-480i  'Koos Nolst Trenite - Life-story' of 14 Feb 1996


  RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
  RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
               Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996

These and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or

    At the Library of Koos' writings on
         http://Art-Org.com

    or (with WWW-browser) at
         ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
         ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI/ACT



Back to the RI-Bulletin index.