26 August 1997
issued and edited 7 Nov 1997
RI-960i 'Jutta: Why I destroyed Koos' Castle Project (1980) - Domination'
from Ambassador for Mankind
Message # RI-960i for Internet
(Also appearing in the RDS-series,
the "Resolving Domination Series".)
'She DOES NOT WANT TO communicate to life.
And in order to not have to admit that to herself
- ELSE SHE WOULD HAVE TO CHANGE IT -
she says to herself that it is different:
"I CANNOT communicate to life",
"I cannot communicate to Koos".
The result is the same:
Deserting life, using all her force and intelligence
towards deserting life - unhindered (because secretly),
and making it look as if others are to blame for her "inability".'
'Ambassador for Mankind'
Solo-Confessional(*) of Jutta Nolst Trenite,
on 26 August 1997, 15:24 GMT,
ordered by Ambassador for Mankind.
[Solo-Auditor(**):] How would "I cannot communicate to Koos"
help you to escape domination?
[Jutta:]
"When I deserted my family for several months ('forever' was intended)
in 1981, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1992, 1993, LFBDBD(***)
[intentionally hiding] until Koos found me back
[despite my clever hiding in order to dominate Koos into
handling ALL life for me - and, by spiritual means,
handling me, on top of that],
one of my big justifications [for deserting life] was
'I cannot communicate to Koos'. LFBD LFBD
[Note by Koos:
She DOES NOT WANT TO communicate to life.
In order to not have to admit that to herself
- ELSE SHE WOULD HAVE TO CHANGE IT -
she says to herself that it is different:
"I CANNOT communicate to life",
"I cannot communicate to Koos".
The result is the same:
Deserting life, using all her force and intelligence
towards deserting life - unhindered,
and making it look as if others are to blame for her "inability".]
[Jutta:]
"I dominated others whom I met while hiding, into
assisting me [providing travel-money]
to stay hidden and stay separate from my family.
"Only one time [the earliest time I deserted my family longer than a week,
I was] openly telling someone
my - entirely false - justifications for Blowing.
[Definition of 'Blowing':
Running away irresponsibly
in order to destroy self and others. (Note by Koos)]
"This was in early 1981, a few months after Freya was born,
when I Blew [secretly ran away] with her
to [stay in the house of] a
girlfriend my family did not know of [Roswitha Werner],
whom I dominated into hiding me
until I myself communicated to Koos what I wanted from him.
"[All the other times,
I did not even tell people
that I HAD run away,
but I cleverly pretended everywhere
that I was in good communication with
and even contributing to my family.
I did so in order to PREVENT them
from getting the idea
to be ethical to me and
contact my family about my criminal behavior.
So I dominated them into hiding me
without them even knowing THAT they did.]
"Covertly, [when I ran away in 1981
and was hiding with a girlfriend Koos did not know]
I wanted Koos to give up the 'Burg [Castle] Project'.
(see the daily newspaper 'Stuttgarter Nachrichten',
a full page article on Koos' Burg Project, of around September 1980,
written by 'Stuttgarter Nachrichten' staff-journalist Karl Geibel
[I don't have the article at hand at the moment])
"Covertly,
I wanted Koos to give up his intention
to put something very beautiful into the world
(which he didn't [just] do as a dreamer,
but for which he was facing
the counter-intentions of many people
in the physical universe).
"Secretly,
I wanted Koos to give up
operating as a spiritually responsible being:
Intending to bring about what is survival,
and
carrying it out -
and while carrying it out,
facing all the counter-intentions that some people have,
and at the same time
winning friends for his project. LFBD
"I 'COULD NOT COMMUNICATE TO KOOS'
[openly
that I wanted
his life and liveliness and good intentions stopped],
that I did NOT want to have a Burg [castle]
when getting and having it required the
handling of counter-intention and suppression by others
who wanted to destroy the beauty of Koos' project. LFBD
[Note by Koos:
Now, that's interesting -
SHE wants to secretly stop Koos
from being active and alive and from having things, and
OF COURSE she would then not want to handle
others' counter-intentions to Koos - quite the contrary!
But this all can not be admitted by her
- neither to herself nor to others -
because she knows it is and it indeed is extremely dishonorable.
But she would like to have the good opinion of herself,
and would like others to think, that
'She would never want to do that to Koos', and
'She would never allow others to do that to Koos', and
'She is a good wife helping her husband,
more than anyone else, in a great project'.
So she instead SAYS:
'I did not want to take as much responsibility
as would be required for the Castle Project'.
THAT sounds acceptable, and
is also much more easily believed by others
than saying the truth:
'I do everything possible to prevent Koos
from being alive and active and
from having things.'
The truth is not very believable.
Even if she said it,
it would not have been believed by many,
but shrugged of as her 'lack of self-confidence'.
But that's what she DID, executed, worked at
- and she did it secretly, covertly
IN ORDER TO be effective in it and
IN ORDER TO not be stopped in it.]
[Jutta:]
"It could have worked to succeed with the project
'if ALL involved would have wanted to create something beautiful'.
[Note by Koos:
How sweet and well-meaning:
'If there would have been no opposition whatsoever,
it would have worked.'
But she was the first one to secretly oppose it!]
[Jutta:]
"The price for the Burg [castle] and its various buildings
from the 12-16th century, situated on a hill,
was minimal:
One million DM (Deutsch Marks - about US$ 600.000).
"We would have gotten money for restoring the old buildings - from
the Office for the Maintenance of National Monuments ['Denkmalstiftung'].
"Koos had intended
to create a Stiftung [Foundation] of several million DM
in the form of very special paintings,
and use the money gotten
from the sales of those paintings and
from other activities at the Burg
to run the activity, and
to make it viable [generating enough income],
having lots of beautiful activities on the Burg area,
a restaurant,
other art activity in collaboration with
gallerists,
antique dealers,
artists, etc.
"It was really a beautiful concept.
"I liked to and did tell all kinds of people about it,
gallerists,
a [political] party deputy,
an architect who had already restored the Chapel in the Burg area
for two million DM [from the National Monuments Fund]. LFBDBDBDBD
"And Koos was informing, in beautiful print,
all the people we knew already
from our art activity in the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg,
and he informed
all the important personalities of Baden-Wuerttemberg
who could have helped,
had they wanted to, [that is,
had Jutta not forcefully and covertly worked
to do exactly the opposite of what she seemed to do (Note by Koos)]."
[Note by Koos:
Jutta starts LOOKING at ME, here,
meaning she is now less destroying my viewpoint.]
[Jutta:]
"Koos had it all planned beautifully and
had talked with all the necessarily people
who would have a say in contributing to the project.
"He faced them all.
He faced their counter-intentions.
He faced their life-suppressive intentions if they had any.
"He was operating as a responsible spiritual being:
Intending to bring about what is survival,
and
carrying it out,
and while carrying it out
facing all the counter-intentions that some people have,
and at the same time
winning friends.
"(Koos is operating like this now,
and he has always operated like this!)
[Koos:] No! [This is not quite the case!]
Koos is very heavily opposed by Jutta
who is [secretly, covertly but with all her mental force]
preventing Koos from operating as a spiritually responsible being.
Jutta very heavily tries to prevent Koos
from operating as a spiritually responsible being.
[Jutta:]
"Right! That is what I did then. And that is what I do also now. F's
"In 1981,
I was Blown [had run away secretly] and
I had separated Koos from his beloved daughter Freya
[I had taken Freya with me]
(while, with the Burg Project,
Koos had also intended to create a future for Freya)
and
I had separated Freya from Koos, her father
(Freya came to us [was born to us, intended to be a child of Koos]
in order to [be with, help and] meet KOOS - and not to meet me).
"I had the nerve to DEMAND of Koos
to give up all of his
spiritually responsible intentions and his
spiritually responsible operations,
if he wanted to see me and Freya come back
[- which I refused to him
by staying at a location and person unknown to him].
[Note by Koos:
THAT is why Jutta SECRETLY ran away and remained HIDDEN -
so that Koos could ONLY - when Jutta wanted it -
get back in communication with Freya and Jutta
AFTER he had 'fulfilled the mental condition'
Jutta wanted to enforce on him:
That Koos would give up being
alive, active, and RESPONSIBLE FOR OTHERS' SURVIVAL,
and instead would let himself be covertly dominated
into living actually a life of
degradation and poverty and irrationality with Jutta.
THAT is DOMINATION - it is evil, mean, ugly -
but that IS domination.
And the sole purpose of her hiding was and is
to exert and enforce DOMINATION:
"You can't effectively plan your future further
- UNLESS I ALLOW you
to find me and ALLOW you
to see what is still there
that could be and
that you want to be part of your future, and
UNLESS I ALLOW you
to find me and
to assess what damage to your life
has been done and has to be repaired
or what re-arrangements have to be made."
Now it is interesting,
that L. Ron Hubbard plays almost exactly
the SAME domination game on his followers,
with his "Ethics" and "Justice" System:
"You do precisely as you are told, and
we are not going to tell you
whether or when we will approve
what you are told to do when you have done it
- your future lies entirely in our hands -
and until then
we DON'T allow you to communicate to any of us."
In other words, there is no predictability.
(Which is one of the ingredients of domination apparently:
No predictability.)
'You do as you are told', you are forced to do things
that are bad for you and that hinder your survival, and
you should BELIEVE that this is
necessary, even vital, for your future survival.
('In order to get back in communication.')
And when you agree to THAT - you 'have had it',
you have agreed to and are being dominated.
The reversal has taken place:
You have agreed that non-survival is survival for you
and you have agreed to act accordingly.
But you can recognize that you did,
and you can recognize that
the intentions of those
who forced you to agree with the reversal
are themselves non-survival,
and that's how you can get out of the domination again.]
[Jutta:]
"With my 'I cannot communicate to Koos'
I wanted to dominate
my girlfriend [Roswitha] to whom I had Blown [had run away to].
(I wanted to dominate her, along with everyone else,
also by mental force of intention,
to accept my righteousness about my 'I cannot communicate to Koos'.)
"I wanted to [SECRETLY] dominate people into
agreeing with me or others that
'Koos can't win such a spiritually responsible game
as the Burg Project is', LFBD
and
'Koos can't expect of ME to confront [face] and handle
all the suppression and counter-intentions that come with it'!
"I wanted to dominate others into
also trying to destroy Koos' spiritually responsible viewpoint
that 'It CAN be done'.
"Now to Koos
- all the time since he started the Burg Project
in beginning of 1980 - LFBDBDBDBD
I never wanted to tell
[I never WANTED to communicate to Koos] the truth that
I REFUSED to handle suppressive [anti-survival] intentions in life.
"But I heavily and successfully PRETENDED to him and to everyone else
that I fully understood and fully appreciated the nature
of Koos' game [his Burg Project and how he went about it], and
that I was very willing to contribute to him in it. LFBD
"That I ACTUALLY was NOT willing to handle suppression
was something that
'I CANNOT COMMUNICATE TO KOOS'."
[Koos:] You, Jutta, are calling it 'unwilling'.
But if fact you are the most violently
anti-spiritual-responsibility person there is
[and being ANTI-responsibility for own and others' life,
is quite a willing, intentional attitude and decision].
You, Jutta, executed it first
in 1977,
[by preventing me secretly from being cause,
with 'It does not work' to handle her,
over Jane Kember and her evil Guardian Office
(see RI-566i 'Former Guardian Jane Kember on Hubbard and Koos'
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-566i.htm)],
then
in 1981, and further
in July 1984 and many other times.
That's your [Jutta's] whole game:
To cave in spiritually responsible people,
to stop them,
to destroy them [with
'It (being alive and responsible and caring) CAN'T be done',
'It (being lively and inventive and light) won't work'].
[Note by Koos:
I am sure the reader knows people like that,
who enforce that all the time and
who blatantly state that 'everybody thinks that way'.]
And [the fact] that you, Jutta, have that in common
with the dominator L. Ron Hubbard, is only co-incidental
[that is, you, Jutta, did and do it ALSO independently from him].
[Jutta:]
"In 1981,
what I 'could not communicate' to Koos, was
that I had intended to destroy spiritually responsible persons, and
that in 1788 [at Benjamin Franklin's retirement]
I had decided to end handling suppression in life." LFBDBD
(see RI-941i 'Benjamin Franklin's fatal decision of 1788' of 24 Oct 1997
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-941i.htm)
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "I cannot communicate to Koos"
help you to dominate others? LFBD
[Jutta:]
"In 1982, summer, I asked
a young Scientologist-girl [Rose Auracher married Gockel], in Stuttgart,
to listen to my Natter [destructive complaining] about Koos.
"I had seen her being in good communication with her own husband, and
I poured out a heavy load on her
of all my 'I cannot communicate to Koos'. LFBD
"I COULD surely communicate to Koos,
but
I did not WANT to communicate to Koos
that I HAD DECIDED TO REFUSE TO HANDLE SUPPRESSION. LFBDBD LFBD
"Koos himself had never made any such decision, and
was very active in handling suppression.
"My Nattery [destructive] 'I cannot communicate to Koos'
didn't help me
to dominate her [Rose, the young Scientologist friend]
(she listened, but she kept her own viewpoint on Koos)
nor did it help me
to escape from any domination,
the domination in 1982 having been, and still being,
by the Suppressive Person L. Ron Hubbard,
whom I then, in 1982, considered still
to be a friend of all the people on Earth." LFBD
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "I cannot communicate to Koos"
help you to escape domination? LFBD
[Jutta:]
"If I cannot communicate to Koos,
how could I then possibly ESCAPE domination!?
"I really made this into a big problem!
"I had stopped to want to confront [to face] suppression!
[Thus inviting more of it! -Ed.]
"So anyone can attack me [successfully hinder my survival],
and - while under attack -
I am disabling myself from handling the attack
because
I have decided 'to NEVER handle suppression'
[and
I decided this, back] in 1788." LFBDBD LFBD LFBD
[Koos:] You refuse to SEE that you are a
destroyer of spiritually responsible persons." LFBD
[Koos:] You are refusing to LOOK at the fact
that you are - out of your own initiative -
not causing anything survival,
that you are
only stopping survival - when left alone.
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "I cannot communicate to Koos"
help you to dominate others?
[Jutta:]
"The Service Fac [fixed and automatic solution],
the evil intention
[that I am using, is]:
"'I KNOW it will NOT work' LFBDBD
(with this I destroy Koos' [or anyone else's]
spiritually responsible intention)." LFBD
'Jutta Nolst Trenite'
Total session time: 3 hr 9 min
Motto of the 'Resolving Domination Series' (RDS):
"Koos is giving much more life than all other beings I know.
I want to be in communication with Koos."
(Jutta's own viewpoint in 1977 for joining Koos)
* (see RI-541i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - I' 20 Apr 1996
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-541i.htm
and following parts II, III, IV)
** [Definition of 'Solo-Auditor':
Someone who writes down his own confession
in response to given questions,
with the purpose to release emotional charge and aberrations.]
*** (The abbreviations sF(small Fall), F(Fall), LF(Long Fall), LFBD(Long
Fall Blow Down) and F/N(Floating Needle) describe reactions on the
E-meter, indicating mental charge (sF, F, LF, LFBD), and release of
charge completed (F/N).
"LFBD-F/N" = truth found out. "ind" = indicated to the person.)
(see RI-610i 'Understanding the E-meter, correctly' of 26 June 1996
RI-648i 'Simplicity of E-meter use, by UNDERSTANDING it' 1 Aug 96
RI-687i 'Notes on E-meter use and Solo-Auditing' of 4 Sept 1996
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-687i.htm)
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind
Copyright 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite
Editors: Freya Nolst Trenite and Blair Wiley
Final Editor: Koos Nolst Trenite
Supervision and publication requested by Jutta Nolst Trenite
Actions and Publication ordered by Ambassador for Mankind
Personal Web-page:
http://ArtOrg.com
Personal Web-Library:
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/
Library Search Engine:
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/search.html
References (available also at the Library "http://Art-Org.com/"):
- About communication
RI-801i '"You can never leave" - The spiritual universe' of 14 Mar 1997
RI-785i 'On Not Remedying Disagreements - "Not Talking"' of 24 Jan 1997
RI-896i 'Telepathy - Questions about getting in communication' 21 June 97
RI-771i 'Use of Telepathy' of 4 Jan 1996
- About rehabilitation of spiritual power and responsibility
RI-925i 'Restoring life-force - Affinity for who and what IS THERE' Aug 97
RI-568i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - IV' of 14 June 1997
RI-545i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - III' 20 May 1996
RI-542i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - II' 2 May 1996
RI-541i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - I' 20 Apr 1996
RI-514Ri 'Confessionals and Blackmail - VERY IMPORTANT' updated 17 June 97
RI-918i 'Spiritual Power defined correctly' of 4 Aug 1997
RI-919i 'Who Destroys your Spiritual Power - Scale of Recognizable Actions'
http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/telepathy.htm
- About Koos and supporting Koos' work
RI-126Ri 'Koos Nolst Trenite - identity' of 29 Mar 1995
RI-480i 'Koos Nolst Trenite - Life-story' of 14 Feb 1996
RI-828i 'Koos Nolst Trenite personally visited' of 19 Apr 1997
RI-827i 'Koos Nolst Trenite, Contributions to' of 18 Apr 1997
RI-871i 'Relaying Truth is your Duty' of 23 May 1997
RI-768i 'Past Lives - Lost Opportunities' issued 29 Dec 1996
- About Benjamin Franklin
RI-941i 'Benjamin Franklin's fatal decision of 1788' of 24 Oct 1997
RI-133i 'Benjamin Franklin's right to NOT be' of 31 Mar 1995
RI-647i 'Benjamin Franklin returning from France - Part I' of 30 July 1996
RI-656i 'Benjamin Franklin returning from France - Part II' of 30 July 96
RI-674i 'Benjamin Franklin returning from France - Part III' of 30 July 96
- About Jutta
RI-959i 'Jutta: "I just don't WANT to handle L. Ron Hubbard's insanity"'
RI-958i 'Jutta: Running away is being dominated completely' of 23 Aug 97
RI-956i 'Jutta: Validating Evil by NOT communicating about it' of 25 Aug 97
RI-954i 'Jutta: "Be with Koos - or let all be dominated by Scientology"'
RI-955i 'Jutta: DENYING COMMUNICATION about sorrow, fear, pain or evil'
RI-947i 'Jutta's Determination to Punish L. Ron Hubbard FOREVER' 18 Aug 97
RI-943i 'Jutta: "Don't face evil - Destroy Koos instead" - I' of 17 Aug 97
RI-944i 'Jutta: "Don't face evil - Destroy Koos instead" - II' of 17 Aug 97
RI-945i 'Jutta: "Don't face evil - Destroy Koos instead" - III' 17 Aug 97
RI-946i 'Jutta: "Don't face evil - Destroy Koos instead" - IV' of 18 Aug 97
RI-818i 'Diana Ross: Facing Jutta, the painter' of 2 Apr 1997
RI-521i 'On Jutta's Refusal to Help Mankind effectively' 20 Mar 1996
- About facing and handling evil and Suppressive Persons
The 'Understanding Suppression Series':
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/usp.htm
RI-929i 'Simple Detection: "Sane or Insane?"' of 11 Sept 1997
RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
RI-629i 'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
RI-908i 'The Ostrich-factor - on facing evil or criminality' of 16 July 97
RI-010i 'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994
RI-024i 'Definition of "Potential Trouble Source" - IMPORTANT' 19 Nov 1994
RI-058Ri 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 1995
RI-487i 'Dialogue: On Enemies and Hostility' of 20 Feb 1996
RI-535i '"An Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend" = INSANE' of 10 Apr 1996
- About RI-Bulletins
RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996
These references and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or
at the Library of Koos' writings on
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/usp.htm
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/telepathy.htm
or at the Archives at
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI/USP
Back to the RI-Bulletin index.