17 December 1997


RI-983i  'Jutta Blackmailed for Eternity by Richard Reiss, Also on Christmas?'


from Ambassador for Mankind


Message # RI-983i for Internet



    'He blackmailed Jutta ever since,
      by making her agree
       that he is the right and only ethical person
        to punish her,
         even "doing her the favor" not to tell others her crime,
      making her agree
       that letting herself be punished
        is "erasing her crime" and
        is her "making up" for the evil she did in the past.'


    "I get Jutta's grief-charge
      that she could not really BE TOGETHER
       with the people of her own group
         because they, continuously,
          nearly found out about what she had done.

    "And that she was in particular very unhappy
      about one groupmember not finding this out about her."


    [Koos:] Well, NOW this one groupmember (= Koos) did find out!

     (tears of Affinity of Koos for Jutta)
     (tears of Auditor [actually Jutta's tears of relief and joy])


                          'Ambassador for Mankind'




That's the answer to the question
 why Jutta wants to destroy life, and us with it:
    In order to degrade HERSELF, to punish HERSELF.

She "SHOULD" make herself unaware, incapable and confused,
 in order to accept the punishment
  that Richard Reiss is "justly" telling her she should take:

    Punishment she should "ethically" take upon her
     in order "to make up"
      for her having been evil and
      for her having destroyed the awareness
       of a large number of beings,
        (which Richard Reiss helped her in)
          eons ago, and
      for her having pretended to her friends
       that she did not do it.

And Richard Reiss kept this, what Jutta had done,
 secret from anybody else, on Jutta's wish,
  in order to "do her a favor", "to let her keep her friends"
   but actually
  to blackmail her for eternity
   into, whenever he wanted to, her destroying herself and
   into her destroying anybody else he wants destroyed by her,
     and
 she willingly or unwillingly doing it (MAKING herself evil)
  IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUNISHING HERSELF
   for her having been evil to so many beings eons ago
   and her having pretended to her group of friends
    that it wasn't her who destroyed the awareness
     of these many simple, but good beings.


Her friends never found out.

Only Richard Reiss did find out, did not forget, actually,
 because he was doing the same thing
  together with her at that time:
     To destroy beings,
     to destroy the awareness of rather weak beings.




HE BLACKMAILED HER EVER SINCE
 BY MAKING HER AGREE
  THAT HE IS THE RIGHT AND ONLY ETHICAL PERSON
   TO PUNISH HER,
    EVEN "DOING HER THE FAVOR" NOT TO TELL OTHERS,
 MAKING HER AGREE
  THAT LETTING HERSELF BE PUNISHED
   IS "ERASING HER CRIME" AND
   IS HER "MAKING UP" FOR THAT EVIL SHE DID IN THE PAST.




But you DON'T make up things
 by being punished!
  You DO make up
   by exposing and remedying what you did wrong.
 (see RI-514Ri 'Confessionals and Blackmail - VERY IMPORTANT' upd. 17 Jun 97
       http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-514ri.htm)


Richard Reiss had managed to trick her into believing
 that it was not he who was together with her
  doing the same things to people and hiding it,
   that Jutta wanted to be punished for,
 but
  he convinced her, or let her believe,
   that he was
    "a superior being
      who - as the only one - knew her crime",
    and
   that he would be
    "the most ethical person to punish her,
      while doing her the favor of not telling others of her crime,
       so that others would continue to like her."



And Jutta wanted to consider this
  very true and right and ethical,
 while in fact
  SHE WAS CONTINUING,
  AND ENCOURAGED BY HIM TO CONTINUE,
   TO HIDE HER CRIME FROM HER FRIENDS.
     (Friends are people who HELP you
       to remedy your wrong-doings!
      Friends don't ask you
       to degrade yourself and
       to be evil to yourself
        'in order to wipe out your crimes'!)

She was being "helped" by a vicious criminal
 into making herself MORE evil
  while pretending to herself that this was "ethical."

Ever since,
 Jutta has been a tool in his hands,
  because the punishment was and is
     that she degrades herself,
     that she is intentionally being evil to herself,
       and that includes
     intentionally making herself be mean and evil to others
      - AS A PUNISHMENT TO HERSELF.

All that,
 in order to "make up" for her eons old crime
  and
 in order to continue to KEEP the fact
  that she WAS that evil, once,
    hidden from others, from friends,
     so that they will NOW not reject her.

Of course,
 friends will not reject her NOW
  when she is NOW being decent and helpful to them!
 Only criminals will still want to reject her
  - but then, criminals will find any excuse
     to reject a person who is acting decent and helpful!



This spiritual blackmail is evil of the darkest kind
 and it is happening right now,
  caused and kept up
   by the most evil being on this planet:
       Richard Reiss,
        the Senior Case Supervisor
         of the highest Scientology Organization called FLAG,
          in Clearwater, Florida, USA.



And Jutta is hiding in Germany,
 punishing herself
  after she failed to execute Richard Reiss' command on her
   to destroy Koos
     - the person she loves most on the whole of Earth
       and the only person on Earth
        who really does truly care about her -
    in order to punish herself,
  and
 she is hiding from executing Koos' earlier request to her
  to help remove Richard Reiss from a position of power.





AND THAT IS THE WHOLE STORY OF WHY
 JUTTA TRIES TO DENY HERSELF AND US
  THE PLEASURE OF ENJOYING CHRISTMAS TOGETHER WITH HER:

    In order to give in to Richard Reiss' intention
     that she "should" make herself mean and evil
      towards herself and others
        in order to punish herself,
         and that is supposed to "make up"
          for the evil she did to others eons ago.

That's not the idea of Christmas!


It IS
 the idea of the most evil being on this planet,
  who is called Richard Reiss,
    and it is
 Jutta not WANTING to look through
  his treachery, through
  his pretense of being "ethical" to her,
    and it is
 Jutta not WANTING to face
  why she is doing what she is doing to herself and to others,
    and her wanting it "solved"
      by punishing herself,
      by driving herself insane
       as a punishment for what she once did,
    and then
      wanting to punish herself for 'wanting to be punished
       instead of being alive and helping others',
     and so on.

Jutta finding it more comfortable
  to destroy herself and her life and the lives of others
    in order to punish herself
     by MAKING herself that evil,
 instead of
  deciding simply
   to be sane and help people and enjoy life,
     which she ALSO is very capable of doing,
       were it not for the eternal blackmail and agreement
        kept there by Richard Reiss on her, with her.



OF COURSE you can never make up for evil
 by being evil and by being mean to yourself and to others, and
 by intentionally denying the enormous love for others
   that you DO have within you and
   that you ARE indeed capable of exerting.



You DO make up for having been evil,
 simply, by helping people
  to lead better and enjoyable and more aware lives,
    so that they will not ever fall for the
     "ethics" of a Richard Reiss, that
        "being punished would clean oneself
          from evil deeds done by oneself",
           and that
        "it is much better
          to keep one's evil hidden from everyone else
           so that one can be blackmailed for eternity by Richard Reiss."






Here follow the session-data:



Telepathic session on 17 December 1997, 10:26 GMT,
 on Jutta Nolst Trenite,
 to help remedy her present insanity while she has run away.


(Continued from
   RI-982Pi 'Wanting To Be Punished In Order Not To Face Own Acts (Jutta)'
   http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-982pi.htm)



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me (Koos)
         from perceiving of her crime?

[Auditor(*):]
"She thinks that 'destroying herself'
  is NOT something bad."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about that?

[Auditor:]
"That she continuously destroys herself:
   Immediately when you have helped her to improve,
    she again destroys herself."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about that?

[Auditor:]
"That she thinks that DESTROYING HERSELF
  is what FREES HER FROM (the bad effects and shame of) HER CRIME.

"You should NOT make her think
  that 'it is something bad to destroy herself'.

"She is ATTACKING you for you making her face
  that destroying herself (making herself evil and confused)
   IS something bad."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about that?

[Auditor:]
"I get: Her shame."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about her shame?

[Auditor:]
"That she is ashamed about attacking you."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about her shame about
          thinking 'it is right to destroy herself'?

[Auditor:]
"She wants to
   destroy herself
    for having been so crazy,
  INSTEAD OF
   her facing exactly WHAT she did, and
  instead of
   being her (true) self, and
   doing good things."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about her crime?

[Auditor:]
"About the crime she has described:
  - That she enjoyed being evil.
  - That she considered herself great.
  - That she considered, later, that SHE can't be good [anymore],
     like those beings she destroyed were good:
        'You can't be good
           because you did evil in the past'
       and
        'in order to be good,
          you have to be stupid or unaware'.
  - That there were very many beings, in the incident,
     whom she destroyed.
  - That it was over a long time-period.
  - Her being a tyrant [there]."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?

[Auditor:]
"Something like:
   As soon as one [of these simple beings] annoyed her a little bit,
    she would destroy him
     by power of intention, like with a spiritual force-beam,
      killing him with a force-beam.

"[I get that] that's from where she derives her 'greatness',
   her feeling of having 'power over others'."
 (see also RI-969i 'Jutta: "See me Great, or I kill you" - The main evil'
            http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-969i.htm)



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?

[Auditor:]
"That she destroyed a being
  in order to show the other beings
    'how powerful she is' and
     how 'daring' she is."


[Koos, sarcastically:]
        That's very "powerful" of course, destroying beings for show,
         really "powerful" -
          much more "powerful" than helping and restoring beings!
        (see also RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
                   http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-602i.htm)



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?

[Auditor:]
"I still got:
  This evil being, Richard Reiss,
   was trying to imitate Jutta then,
     trying to also dominate others
      in the way he saw her do it.

"I get:
  He was doing it
   IN ORDER NOT TO BE DESTROYED BY JUTTA."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?

[Auditor:]
"That she made them into her slaves."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?

[Auditor:]
"She does not want you to see
  THAT she is hiding her crime, and
  HOW she is hiding her crime:
    - By pretending
       that it wasn't her, but someone else,
       or that she 'only did it in her own thoughts'.
    - By deriving this (feeling of) 'greatness' from it
       [and pretending that it is her being greater than others,
         but in fact it is
          that she managed to kill very many beings
           who were not able to defend themselves against her,
         and so she feels she is 'greater' than all of them,
          she is 'great':
            She is being a great and evil, vicious killer,
             and then pretends to be superior to others!]

"She does NOT want you to perceive
  HOW HARD SHE IS WORKING TO COVER IT UP."





[Koos:] How is Jutta inhibiting my perception
         of how she destroyed those beings?

[Auditor:]
"By making you believe
  that 'SHE would never do such a thing'."



[Koos:] How is Jutta inhibiting my perception
         of how she destroyed those beings?

[Auditor:]
"By HIDING
   [but secretly executing
     - especially when Koos is not looking,
       or by making Koos not look at]
  her intentions to dominate people."



[Koos:] How is Jutta inhibiting my perception
         of how she destroyed those beings?

[Auditor:]
"By putting out that
   'those were small beings anyway', that
   'they would have died anyway' -
   'they would have destroyed each other anyway'."
      [But they only destroyed each other
        because Jutta MADE them go into a panic.]



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?

[Auditor:]
"I get:
  By making them kill each other -
  by making them panic."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?

[Auditor:]
"By giving them wrong indications
  about what caused the panic and confusion."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?

[Auditor:]
"That she pretended, later,
  that she is not the cause of their being destroyed."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?


[Koos:] What is Jutta withholding from me, right now?  LFBDBD

[Auditor:]
"That she actually did not always enjoy destroying them,
  but
 that Jutta was making them wrong, attacking them, destroying them
  for THEM not finding out that SHE was destroying them."


[Koos:] That's a basic computation of a murderer. 
         He murders others
          FOR them NOT seeing his evil intentions,
          for NOT helping him by
           finding out about him and by stopping him.

[Auditor:]
"[I get] Jutta's
    'THEY are very evil and very crazy
      for not finding out
       that SHE was the one destroying them'."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about how she destroyed those very many beings?

[Auditor:]
"That she treated them
  as if 'she can do anything she likes with them'."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about the way she hides the crime?

[Koos:] One way is to stay away.
         She hides it by running away and staying away.


[Auditor:]
"To the people she did not destroy, she pretends
   that she did NOT [that SHE is not the one who did] destroy the others,
    but
   that she is another person,
   that she is 'a good person who helps them
    to repair the damage done by someone'.

"Pretending that she is someone helpful,
  instead of what she IS:
   The person who actually destroyed those beings."



[Koos:] To whom did she pretend that?

[Auditor:]
"To beings of her own group,
  who discovered that there was
   destruction done to that other group of beings.

"She pretended that she was there only REPAIRING damage,
  and that she did NOT CAUSE the damage.

"They said to her:
   'We now see how much you have changed,
     how you have come to your senses,
     that you have become responsible now'."



[Koos:] This is very true, that Jutta did this in this way.
         I see times this lifetime
          where this was almost found out about her.

        This, of course, is THE ULTIMATE OF IRRESPONSIBILITY:
          Causing the damage,
           and then
          letting oneself be praised
           for 'being so responsible
            as to "discover" the damage
            and to "try to repair it".'

        You would call her betrayal:
         Betraying herself,
         betraying the others who praise her falsely.

        So behind this are the actual, hidden intentions:
         - To make others have a GOOD opinion and give praise,
            about secretly having been,
             and having enjoyed to be, very evil to others,
              and
         - to make others have a GOOD opinion
            of how excellently she hides her own past evil
              and
         - to MAKE others most thoroughly destroy her for eternity
            (by not informing them that they actually praise her
              FOR her having been extremely, but secretly, evil to others).

        Now if you really want to destroy yourself for all eternity,
         go and get others to PRAISE you
          for secretly having enjoyed being very evil.



[Koos:] Did anybody ever find out?

[Auditor:]
"She THOUGHT that Richard Reiss did find out,
  when later she [met him but] did not recognize him.

"And she panicked when he told her,
  and she thought
  [or he made her think,
    in order to keep her from finding out
     that he ALSO had done the SAME evil to others]
   that she had to be punished very heavily
     for her crime,
      AND punished
     for her pretending that she did not do it.

"'Richard Reiss is the only one who knew it,
   so HE is entitled to, or is the only one who CAN, punish her.'



"I get: Jutta wondering now
   why Richard Reiss did not tell others about it -
    which would have made others also punish her."


[Koos:] Finally some sensible questioning from her!



[Koos:] What can Jutta say about
         why Richard Reiss did not tell others?

[Auditor:]
"That he did not tell others, because:
   - It was very bad what she did.
   - Only he can punish her properly.
   - He said to her that
      by not telling others, he is doing her a favor,
       because others would consider it SO bad [what she had done]
        that 'THEY WOULD NEVER HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH HER'."



[Koos:] We see and know, now,
         how big a so-called favor it was of Richard Reiss
          to not tell others, to not tell her friends,
          to not make her tell her friends:

        Jutta is STILL stark staring mad and evil, and she is
         STILL completely in his grip,
         STILL NOW going insane on his command,
          BECAUSE he did not tell others about what Jutta did,
           and
          on top of that,
           he then could and also did blackmail her with it
            "because if others knew, no one would
              ever want to have anything to do with her."

        It's not true, you see,
         many decent people DO want to and did support her
          after she stopped pretending
           and truly confessed her crimes to them.

        Sure, some people, mostly irresponsible or dishonest people,
         would reject her for what she has done
          IN THE DISTANT PAST
           but which she confessed and exposed,
            and IS NOT DOING NOW.

        And heavy criminals are very interested in her
         only as long as she can and wants to be blackmailed
          (as long as her crime is NOT known publicly or
            not known by her friends).

        That's how "good" it is, to hide someone's crimes.
        That's how "good" it is, to want one's own crimes kept hidden.
        That's how "good" it is, to want to be punished
         by a criminal who does not inform one's friends.


[Auditor:]
"I get further:
  [And this is really the blackest of evil of black magic evil]
    Richard Reiss telling her
      that HE is a person who DOES stay with her
        even THOUGH she did such a bad thing, and
      that he is able to punish her properly for it.

       [As I stated,
         "making up" for something
           by being punished
         IS NOT making up,
          it is causing MORE destruction,
           intentional and desired destruction
            by the being who wants to be punished.

        When someone wants to HELP you
         after you committed a crime,
          he helps you to face what you did and
          he helps you to remedy the damage done.

        But a criminal uses it
         to have the "right" to demand
          that you cave yourself in,
          that you destroy YOURSELF.

        That's A CRIME ON TOP OF THE CRIME ONE DID.
          And that is NOT making the first crime undone.
           As Jutta proves here, conclusively.
         For all eternity, she keeps up the crime
          that Richard Reiss "helps" her to get rid of.

        And she even herself complains
         that she can't get rid of it
          - despite being "helped" by
             Richard Reiss telling her that she
              simply has not punished herself enough yet!  (Note by Koos)]


[Auditor:]
"I get Jutta thinking:
   'Because she destroyed all those beings,
     she deserves to be destroyed also THAT MANY TIMES'."


[Freya:] I myself, feel now, about Jutta:
           'How terrible, how much time was lost,
             but at least now Jutta can become sane',
          when you, Koos, talked about
           that ONE SHOULD NOT HIDE
            ANOTHER's [nor one's own] CRIME.

        And Jutta was also happy about it
         [about my thinking that now she can become sane].

        But now, she again hides it,
          thinking she can [only] be with people
           if she hides it [what evil she has done],
           if they have a good opinion of her.

        [That is why Richard Reiss enforces on her that
            "No one would want to be with her,
              if she would disclose her crime",
          so that she cannot get out of the grip he has on her.]



[Koos:] What can Jutta say about
         why Richard Reiss did not tell others?

[Auditor:]
"- Because he wanted to punish her
    for what she did to him.

"- In order to drive her crazy.

"- In order that nobody finds out
    how insane Richard Reiss himself is.

"- In order that Richard Reiss can pretend to Jutta
    that HE is great (and helpful)."



[Koos:] What [else] can Jutta say about
         why Richard Reiss did not tell others?

[Auditor:]
"- Because he wants to look down on others, on everybody.
    He does not tell anybody the crime he knows of another,
     in order to make them less informed than he is.

"- In order to blackmail Jutta,
   in order to make Jutta into his slave."



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about HOW the crime of Jutta is being hidden?

[Auditor:]
"- 'IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE KNOWN,
     SHE IS MAKING UP FOR IT BY BEING PUNISHED'."


[Koos, sarcastically:] Nice character this Richard Reiss is!



[Koos:] What is Jutta inhibiting me from perceiving
         about HOW the crime is being hidden?

[Auditor:]
"'Only Richard Reiss is allowed to talk about it [to her]
   - because HE has an ethical viewpoint on it'."



[Koos:] What is that 'ethical viewpoint'?

[Auditor:]
"'He was there, it was also done to him,
   and he is punishing her for it'.



[Koos:] How is that an ethical viewpoint
         according to Jutta?

[Auditor:]
"'IT IS MORE ETHICAL [to want that someone punishes himself for it]
   THAN HER OWN VIEWPOINT
    OF HIDING IT, OF DOING AS IF IT DID NOT EXIST'."

        [In this case of punishing AND keeping the crime hidden anyway,
          it is obviously a MUCH WORSE,
           A MUCH LESS ETHICAL VIEWPOINT.  (Note by Koos)]



[Koos:] How else is that an ethical viewpoint
         according to Jutta?

[Auditor:]
"His viewpoint is more ethical than her own:
   'He was there - he felt how it was to be destroyed'."



[Koos:] How else is that an ethical viewpoint
         according to Jutta?

[Auditor:]
"She thinks 'she is making up for it by being punished,
  and he wants to punish her
   ["equals" he wants her to make up for it]'."

"I get:
  Jutta wondering why Richard Reiss did not tell others -
    that that would have been a much better way of punishing her:
      So that others
       do not want to have [anything] to do with her
       and consider her dangerous."

 F/N(**) [= some truth regained]


[Koos:] Tell Jutta that she F/N'ed on that,
         that Richard Reiss, if he really HAD wanted to punish her,
          WOULD have told others.

[Auditor:]
"OK. I did.


"I noticed Richard Reiss disagreeing [just now],
  saying [the thought] that 'it is much better to hide it'.



[Koos:] Who would consider it, according to Jutta,
         better NOT to hide it but to tell others?

[Auditor:]
"- Koos.
 - The members of her own group.


"I GET HER GRIEF-CHARGE
  THAT SHE COULD NOT REALLY BE TOGETHER
   WITH THE PEOPLE OF HER OWN GROUP
     BECAUSE THEY CONTINUOUSLY
      NEARLY FOUND OUT ABOUT WHAT SHE HAD DONE.

"And that she was in particular very unhappy
  about one groupmember not finding this out about her."


[Koos:] Well, NOW he (= Koos) DID find out!

 (tears of Affinity of Koos for Jutta)

 (tears of Auditor [actually Jutta's tears])


[Auditor:]
"I get:
   Richard Reiss saying [just now]:
     'But for such a long time Koos DIDN'T find out.'
   Jutta saying:
     'Yes, because of you [Richard Reiss]!'
   Richard Reiss saying:
     'But you didn't tell him [Koos] either!'

[Koos:] Well, she did now.

[Auditor:]
"Jutta is happy!"

 (Koos' VVGI's [Very, Very Good Indicators],
  Koos' tears of joy and Affinity)


[Koos:] Do you want to still add anything?

[Auditor:]
"I get [just now] some pushing by Jutta
  at my Anchorpoints [at my viewpoint]
    [probably me noticing Richard Reiss pushing heavily
      at Jutta's Anchorpoints (at her viewpoint)].

"I tell Jutta:
   'Jutta, you can hold on to me!'
  so that she (her viewpoint)
   is not pushed over by Richard Reiss."


[Koos:] [Is that] all [you want to say before I end the session]?

[Auditor:]
"Yes."


"[I noticed just now that]
   Richard Reiss is telling Jutta:
     'Now the session is over, now you can stop looking.'

   [As he told her so many times in the past:
     "Now you can stop looking, after you looked."]

"I tell Jutta:
  'Don't listen to Richard Reiss!'"



(TA motion: 35.6 TA Divisions)

                                     Total session time: 1 hr 28 mins




Motto of the 'Resolving Domination Series' (RDS):

        "Koos is giving much more life than all other beings I know.
         I want to be in communication with Koos."

                  (Jutta's own viewpoint in 1977 for joining Koos)



* ('Auditor': Someone who carefully listens.)

  [Definition of 'Auditing':
      Confessional in response to given questions,
       with the purpose to release emotional charge and aberrations.]


** (The abbreviations sF(small Fall), F(Fall), LF(Long Fall), LFBD(Long
    Fall Blow Down) and F/N(Floating Needle) describe reactions on the
    E-meter, indicating mental charge (sF, F, LF, LFBD), and release of
    charge completed (F/N).
    "LFBD-F/N" = truth found out. "ind" = indicated to the person.)

   (see RI-687i 'Notes on E-meter use and Solo-Auditing' of 4 Sept 1996
         http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-687i.htm)



Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind

Copyright 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite


Footnote One:

    Richard Reiss, as Metternich of Austria,
     tells Jutta, as Marie Louise of Austria,
      to destroy herself by marrying Napoleon Bonaparte (1810),
     and she does, after some reluctance,
      destroy all her decency that is herself,
        in order to satisfy his request to marry Napoleon Bonaparte,
          whom Jutta, as Marie Louise of Austria,
           knew very well to be an evil, destructive and insane person
            SHE definitely did not and would never want to marry.

    But "for the good of the group", as Metternich wanted her to see it,
     she had to cave herself in, and dutifully did,
      when forcefully demanded to do so by Metternich,
     and then she consented
      to marry her worst nightmare, Napoleon Bonaparte.

    I got Jutta, in 1984, in an Auditing session,
     to face her decision of saying "Yes" to Napoleon, and
    I got her
     to realize and voice and get the reality
      that she also could have
       said "No" at the marriage ceremony, to Napoleon.

    This made her very, very sane, very able.

    She lifted (not telling me about it, though)
     her self-imposed "I CAN'T"
      - which is her
         "I can't really be alive
           because I have to punish myself",
         held in place, on her unknown request,
          by Richard Reiss/Metternich -
   (I got her to lift this decision),
     for about two hours,
      and then
    she LET HERSELF, WANTED TO, BE
     TOTALLY CAVED IN AGAIN BY L. RON HUBBARD
      WITH HIS 'HYMN OF ASIA'-"Serenity"-SOLUTION,
        IN ORDER TO NOT HAVE TO FACE
         THE VERY UNCONFRONTABLE INTENTIONS AND AGREEMENTS
          OF RICHARD REISS ON HER PAST AND PRESENT AND FUTURE.

        (A so-called "Serenity"-attitude which preaches
          total irresponsibility
            for oneself and
            for anybody else and
            for anybody's destructive intentions on oneself
          while feeling "great" and "invulnerable"
           but destroying all aliveness and
            all decency and care for others,
           and that
            secretly, not telling others openly
             that that is what one is doing).



Footnote Two:

    Richard Reiss tells her to destroy Koos' activity
     and she does,
      but does not quite manage.
     And so,
       because Richard Reiss keeps pressuring her
        that she must do that
         in order to punish herself,
      she runs away (on 17 October).
     Then
      she still spends a month
       to destroy Koos by purely spiritual means,
      and finally gives that up
       when Koos finds out (on 3 December)
        that Richard Reiss is behind the whole thing.


    But Jutta did this in order to be secretly
     as evil to herself and to degrade herself as much as possible,
       because Richard Reiss says
        that's how she should punish herself for what she did,
        and that she will lose all her friends
          if she does not keep it all secret!


Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind

Copyright 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite



Personal Web-page:
  http://ArtOrg.com

Personal Web-Library:
  http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/

Library Search Engine:
  http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/search.html



References (available also at the Library "http://Art-Org.com/"):

- About Sanity and Care and Responsibility

  RI-449i  'A Rule For Freedom' of 14 Jan 1996
  RI-714i  'State of Sanity, Definition of' of 24 Oct 1996
  RI-537i  'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996

  RI-781BPI 'Raising Children - or Keeping Them Small?' of 16 Jan 1997
  RI-631i  'Definition of "Woman"' of 12 July 1996

  RI-738Si 'Christianity - Love, and Guilt solved' of 22 Dec 1996

  RI-629i  'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
  RI-602i  'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996

  RI-974i  'Truth about "Not putting attention on evil of others"' 27 Nov 97
  RI-908i  'The Ostrich-factor - on facing evil or criminality' 16 Jul 97

  RI-929i  'Simple Detection: "Sane or Insane?"' of 11 Sept 1997
  RI-962i  'The Master Path to Life - Platonism understood' of 1 Nov 97


- About Richard Reiss

  RI-900i  'The Spiritual Killer Reiss (FLAG - "Church of Scientology")'
  RI-890i  'Flag's Richard Reiss - Why to remove him' of 4 Aug 96
  RI-891i  'Flag's Richard Reiss - his intention to hide from Koos' 11 Aug 96

  RI-892i  'Flag's Reiss - million times worse than Adolf Hitler' 19 June 97
  RI-893i  'FLAG's Reiss - How he dominated a planetary population' 20 June 97

  RI-889i  'Richard Reiss is "Safe" at Flag (in Florida)' of 17 June 1997
  RI-889i-A  'More Black Scientology of Richard Reiss' of 18 June 1997

  RI-746i  'Biggest Present Enemy of Mankind - Richard Reiss' of 26 Nov 96
  RI-745i  'FLAG and Richard Reiss equals Black Scientology' of 14 Sept 96

  RI-792i  'Destroying destroyer Reiss of Flag is MORE destruction' 16 Feb 97
  RI-780i  'Removing FLAG's Richard Reiss the wrong way' of 12 Jan 1997

  RI-761i  'Slaves of FLAG's Richard Reiss - VERY IMPORTANT' of 26 Nov 1996
  RI-757i  'Making a violent psychotic saner' of 11 Dec 1996
  RI-754i  'Bitter truth about L. Ron Hubbard and Richard Reiss' 4 Dec 96

  (and many more)


- About Jutta

  RI-980i  'Character of any heavy Suppressive - Jutta seen by Freya' Dec 97
  RI-979i  'Deserting Their Own Hero - Why (Jutta, Michael Jackson, etc.) Do'
  RI-978i  'The Wall of Shame - Remedy of Hell, Jutta, Socrates, Black Magic'

  RI-972i  'Jutta: "How I want to destroy LIFE, since 1788"' of 4 Sept 97
  RI-972Si 'Hidden but Executed Intentions of the paintress Jutta' 23 Nov 97
  RI-976Di 'Psychose - am Beispiel der Malerin Jutta - ins Auge gefasst'

  RI-969i  'Jutta: "See me Great, or I kill you" - The main evil' 3 Sept 97
  RI-967i  'Jutta: "Communicating with Koos is knowing myself"' of 26 Aug 97
  RI-966i  'Jutta: "Being Unaware is NOT 'Keeping my Viewpoint Clean'"'
  RI-964i  'Jutta: With Koos, care for people - Without Koos, dominating...'

  RI-958i  'Jutta: Running away is being dominated completely' of 23 Aug 97
  RI-956i  'Jutta: Validating Evil by NOT communicating about it' 25 Aug 97
  RI-955i  'Jutta: DENYING COMMUNICATION about sorrow, fear, pain or evil'

  RI-961i  'Jutta: "I am praised for helping Mankind, but now destroying it"'
  RI-965i  'Jutta and Ron Hubbard: "Dominate and Be Dominated!" - VITAL DATA'
  RI-943i  'Jutta: "Don't face evil - Destroy Koos instead" - I' of 17 Aug 97

  RI-818i  'Diana Ross: Facing Jutta, the painter' of 2 Apr 1997
  RI-521i  'On Jutta's Refusal to Help Mankind effectively' 20 Mar 1996
  RI-789i  'PROPAGANDA of L. Ron Hubbard almost exposed July 1994' 6 Feb 97

  (and more)


- About RI-Bulletins

  RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
  RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
               Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996


These references and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or

    at the Library of Koos' writings on
         http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/
         http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/usp.htm
         http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/telepathy.htm

    or at the Archives at
         ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
         ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI/USP




Back to the RI-Bulletin index.