21 December 1997
RI-984i 'The Criminal Mind - Cowards Don't Dare Create Life - VITAL DATA'
from Ambassador for Mankind
Message # RI-984i for Internet
(Shareware-value 10 US$)
(Also appearing in the RDS-series,
the "Resolving Domination Series.")
'You have to rise above the idea of
"not deserving" and of "punishment",
and get used to the idea, in all situations,
that good is creating survival
and
that destroying survival IS evil.'
'And the truth of it is only:
PEOPLE ARE GOOD
WHEN - AND AS SOON AS - THEY CREATE
GOOD EFFECTS.
THEY ARE BAD
WHEN THEY CREATE - AND AS SOON AS THEY CREATE -
BAD EFFECTS.'
'He and others had, and have the idea
that once one had been very evil,
one can't be called a good person anymore.
'And therefore one had an excuse
1. To say it is no USE to make any effort to be good,
"because one never will be called good by others anymore."
2. To destroy - in order to create a good image of oneself -
the awareness of others (and self)
about times of having been evil,
or destroy their or own ability to be aware of it.'
'Ambassador for Mankind'
The vital data is spread over this RI-Bulletin,
especially inside the Notes.
Vital, vital data,
that will get you to understand and handle criminals
or those whom you never suspected
but are heavy criminals of the blackest kind,
who dominate others with a glance.
Solo-Confessional(*) of Jutta Nolst Trenite,
on 3 September 1997, 07:40 GMT,
ordered by Ambassador for Mankind.
[Solo-Auditor(**):] How would "me running away"
make others wrong?
[Jutta:]
"It would make Koos wrong for
keeping his position, LFBD
facing non-survival intentions,
facing intentions to destroy him,
facing intentions to destroy life, LFBD
facing the evil intentions to destroy life
of anyone whom Koos detects as having these evil intentions." F(***)
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make others wrong?
[Jutta:]
"'To run away' would make Koos wrong for facing F
evil intentions of others to destroy life,
for facing these intentions and disagreeing with them." LF
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make others wrong?
[Jutta:]
"'To run away' would make Koos wrong
for disagreeing with evil intentions LFBD(***)
to destroy life and
for devising means to survive and
for helping others to survive." LFBD
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make others wrong?
[Jutta:]
"'To run away' would make Koos wrong
- for keeping his position,
- for keeping his viewpoint,
- for disagreeing with the destructive intentions of
L. Ron Hubbard, F
Richard Reiss, F
me, Jutta, F
Koos' father, F
Koos' mother, F
Noel,
Freya,
(...),
(...).
"It would make Koos wrong for wanting to help anyone
- who has evil intentions -
not to have evil intentions on life,
but to contribute to life. LF
"My 'me running away' would make Koos wrong
for HELPING anyone [including me, Jutta]
when he has evil intentions
[when he feels compelled to destroy
the aliveness and awareness of others]."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make others wrong?
[Jutta:]
"I would [and do] blame
others who [as anyone does] have suppressive intentions,
that THEY are running away from life.
(I accuse them,
instead of to indicate to them their true intention
and to disagree with their execution of it.)
"That's what they are actually doing. LFBD
"They ARE running away from life:
- they are refusing to duplicate
the Realities [viewpoints, problems, ideas, likes and dislikes]
of others,
- they are refusing to solve problems in such a way
that there is survival [for all concerned],
- they want to have nothing to do with others,
- they want to destroy others,
- they want to destroy life." LFBD
[As do I, Jutta, by running away myself
from facing what is actually there.]
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"It would make me right for
'Being a Victim to' [WANTING my life destroyed by] those
who [also] run away from life,
who [also] refuse to contribute,
who [also] have decided to destroy life." LF
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"It would make me right
for blaming such other Suppressive Persons (see Footnote),
who want to run away from life and
who refuse to contribute,
[blaming THEM
- NOT admitting
that it was ENTIRELY my own decision to be a coward,
even though I can face life very well
and enjoy doing so when I decide to do so -
I blame OTHERS]
for MY running away, LF
- with the justification
that there must be places in the world
where there are no Suppressives
[who remind me of my OWN intentions
to destroy and punish others and
who WANT me to not control my evil], LF
or
where there are ALSO people who like to contribute LF's
[WITHOUT looking at the fact
that I HAVE BEEN very evil and
without looking at the fact
that I still destroy the awareness of others
by 'zapping' them with bursts of my spiritual energy].
[Jutta:]
"'To run away', means,
to find a place in the world
where I do NOT need
to disagree, disagree, disagree with suppression, LF
but
where from the very beginning [immediately and always]
I get agreement on contribution to survival. LF
[That others immediately and always do
what SHE wants of them,
regardless of what THEY want,
and they should immediately do what SHE wants,
because 'THAT is survival for everybody',
even though she flatly refuses
to look at what others ARE doing that is survival
and even though she flatly refuses
to care and take responsibility for others.
In other words:
Where she is allowed to be a 'powerful' tyrant
dominating all others into facing all non-survival FOR her,
so she 'can live'. (Note by Koos)]
[Jutta:]
"What did I get when I ran away in 1790
[at my death as Benjamin Franklin]?
"I ran to a place [the Implant Station on Mars]
where there was and is the BIGGEST disagreement with
survival and with contribution,
where there was and is no agreement AT ALL about
survival and about contribution.
(see RI-833i 'Between-lives Implanter on Mars' of 22 Apr 1997
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-833i.htm)
[Note by Koos:
In actual fact, as we know now (on 21 December 1997),
he then wanted to be completely unaware of the fact
that he, in earlier lifetimes, had been extremely evil,
as described for instance in
RI-983i 'Jutta Blackmailed for Eternity by Reiss...' 17 Dec 97
(http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-983i.htm).
In actual fact,
Benjamin Franklin was reminded by the opponent in his life,
- a Mr. Arthur Lee, whom Franklin did not face very well -
that he also had slumbering, dormant intentions
to be very, very evil to himself and to others.
Jutta says now
that the reason they remained slumbering,
during almost all of her lifetime as Benjamin Franklin,
was that she kept her friendship
with her father, the father of Benjamin Franklin,
who taught her to be decent and caring,
whom she says was (or reminds her) of Koos.
The truth is that
Jutta does control her destructive intentions
to the degree that
and how strongly
she decides to be a friend of Koos,
to let Koos be a friend to her, that is.
And when she runs away from Koos,
she is entirely evil and
destroys life and
wants to destroy others and drive them insane
"to punish them" for whatever reason suits her.
In 1788, Benjamin Franklin decided
"to not care for people anymore" and
to seek ways to make himself "stay 'good'."
He and others had, and have the idea
that once one had been very evil,
one can't be called a good person anymore.
And therefore one had an excuse
1. To say it is no USE to make any effort to be good,
"because one never will be called good by others anymore."
2. To destroy - in order to create a good image of oneself -
the awareness of others (and self)
about times of having been evil,
or destroy their or own ability to be aware of it.
Very "logical."
But when one decides to be not evil,
like Benjamin Franklin did most of his life,
one IS good.
Good is defined as creating survival.
But these guys make it into some personal thing.
And they encourage each other to think that
- because they have been criminal, very criminal at one time -
they "can't be decent."
This is utter nonsense.
They DID WANT TO BE CRIMINAL, and were.
They then WANTED TO STOP BEING CRIMINAL and did.
But they don't like to admit that they WERE criminal,
because "people would not want to be with them,
would consider them dangerous",
and so they invent all these crazy concepts
that "they can only be good
if they hide the evil that they had done",
or "only if others don't know about it"
OR ONLY IF THEY
MAKE THEMSELVES UNAWARE
OF THE EVIL THEY HAD DONE IN THE PAST
AND IF THEY
AVOID,
RUN AWAY FROM AND/OR
SPIRITUALLY 'ZAP' INTO NOT LOOKING AT THEM,
ANYBODY WHO REMINDS THEM OF,
OR LOOKS AT THEIR PAST EVIL.
Well, that's again being evil "in order to stay good."
The whole concept of good is completely lost on them.
They have been so evil and destructive to others
that they feel the whole of life
can better be seen as a personal game,
where others exist mainly in one's thoughts
and one can create or destroy others
(their aliveness, their awareness)
without that it really affects them.
And they 'zap' people
and that gives them a feeling of "power":
They CAN make themselves "good"
by preventing others from seeing their evil.
The trick - which they manage -
is of course to spiritually 'zap' another
without him noticing WHO did it.
And they are VERY GOOD at
'zapping' another and make him believe
that he 'zapped' himself,
or that his best friend did it.
Those are the most vital tricks of their trade.
(see also RI-107i '...Ultimate Third Party Reiss' 13 Mar 95
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-107i.htm)
They get to define 'good'
as "having a good opinion of themselves",
as "others confirming their good opinion of themselves."
They get to define 'good'
as "being aware only of their own good intentions,
and not of the evil they did or still feel compelled to do."
Only then CAN they be good, they like to say.
But 'good' is
creating survival effects,
mainly survival effects for self AND for others.
And that's all there is to it.
IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO, AT ALL,
WITH HOW EVIL ONE WAS BEFORE.
But as described above,
people who have been evil
want to introduce all kinds of concepts
which have nothing to do with being good:
Like 'punishment for evil',
like 'punishment for being aware of evil',
like 'having the OPINION of oneself of "being a good person"
IS being good',
like 'nobody knowing about
their past - past lives included - is necessary
in order to be good.'
And the truth of it is only:
PEOPLE ARE GOOD
WHEN - AND AS SOON AS - THEY CREATE
GOOD EFFECTS.
THEY ARE BAD
WHEN THEY CREATE - AND AS SOON AS THEY CREATE -
BAD EFFECTS.
All the rest is just mechanisms
to MAKE others evil,
to MAKE others decide
that "They can't be good, because...".
It is the ideas that criminals use,
to try and MAKE you, me and others
follow our impulses
to hate others,
to hate ourselves,
to destroy others,
to destroy ourselves,
to stop being alive and active.
And WE HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE
THAN TO STAND UP TO THESE ATTACKS ON US.
There is and will always be
a continuous bombardment of these ideas on us,
with greater or lesser spiritual force of energy
depending on the spiritual force of
the criminal who spreads them.
The more of us stand up to them,
the easier it gets for all of us
to stand up to them.
Jutta has decided, once again, on 17 October 1997,
NOT to stand up to these mechanisms that enforce evil,
but to fully give into them,
those mechanisms as generated by her and others and
bombarded onto her and others in particular by Richard Reiss
(see RI-983i 'Jutta Blackmailed for Eternity by Reiss...'
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-983i.htm)
and then also to not control anymore
her own ideas about why she
should and wants to destroy
her own awareness, and that of others.
To get back to the subject of Benjamin Franklin,
he, in 1788, decided
that he had caused himself
to be entirely in control of his evil impulses, and
he - VERY INSANELY wanting himself
to have all the very unbecoming glory -
denied that it was his father who had
essentially and substantially helped him
to control his evil side.
And so his evil side came up again:
Franklin decided HE was "great",
so "great" that NOW he
did not have to care for others, for Mankind, anymore.
You see, according to the definition of good,
he, with that decision, which he executed also since 1788,
IMMEDIATELY WAS A BAD PERSON.
But NOT according to
the criminal's definition of "good."
And so Benjamin Franklin, in 1790, shortly after his death,
EXECUTED his intention
to be made completely unaware of his bad side,
as if it would not exist, for all eternity,
AND
to never be reminded of all his previous lives'
decisions to be forcefully and intelligently
evil to others and
to confuse them and
destroy others' awareness
- the main reminder of him having enjoyed
to be very evil in the past,
was the person of Richard Reiss.
Franklin executed this intention
to destroy his own awareness of himself and of others,
by going to the Implanters with their "zapping-machines",
and letting himself be totally overwhelmed
till he decided he would be "a nothing forever"
with no awareness of his friends,
no awareness of his decency, of his bad side,
awareness of nothing.
This took a few days in that Implant machine
which 'zaps' energy to a spirit
in a similar way as he has 'zapped' others
by direct SPIRITUAL energy (not mechanical at all),
as HE had 'zapped' others
into unawareness and into confusion and
as he, now called Jutta, and other criminals
are still doing it to others also at present.
And he did not - CANNOT WIN THAT GAME -
because spirits of this caliber
can not make themselves
"dead forever", or "unaware forever."
Actually they are
by their decision to stop all life for themselves,
also creating the intention to stop their friends.
But they exactly try
not to be aware of their friends,
so, their friends "better not tell them"
that they feel badly affected, feel stopped by them.
The only response or reply is big 'zaps' of spiritual energy
on their friends:
"Don't bother me, I am trying to destroy you!!
So that I am not aware of your existence!
So that I can say to myself you don't exist!"
And Benjamin Franklin did all these things,
in 1790 in the Implant station, after his death.
(see RI-133i 'Benjamin Franklin's right to NOT be' of 31 Mar 1995
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-133i.htm)
And Jutta is trying to do it right now,
especially since her running away on 17 October 1997,
for a whole month we, her family-members,
got lighting storms of spiritual 'zapping' from her:
"You don't exist!!
I am 'great'!
I can be as evil to others and to myself as I please,
and feel 'powerful and great'
for making you destroy your awareness
of what I actually am doing
to you and to others and to myself!"
And on 3 December 1997 I got her,
by one and a half month of telepathically Auditing her,
to see the fact that we actually DO exist
no matter how hard she attempts
to destroy our existences
both in the physical universe
and in the spiritual universe.
And I got her to let go of Richard Reiss for a short while,
and she told someone
that she HAS a family and
that she wants to sell him a painting
in order to care for Koos and her children,
and this person then bought for a decent price
of which the next day Jutta,
still wanting to continue to not be faced in any way,
still wanting to go back to criminality or "Serenity"
without restraint,
sent the money - in order that she could stay hidden -
to our Electricity Company
who then transferred it to us.
I have never managed, this lifetime,
to get Jutta to stop her game
of wanting to be made evil by Richard Reiss
(so evil that she mixes up
what are her own evil intentions and
what are those of Richard Reiss
and of course she can't control them then)
for longer than a day
- in which she then creates a lot of survival,
and is a good person.
After she is good,
she wants to "feel good",
have herself have the opinion
that she is now 'a good being'
(which she defines wrongly and impossibly)
WITHOUT BEING GOOD,
WITHOUT CREATING SURVIVAL,
WITHOUT CONTROLLING HER BAD SIDE.
She has two solutions
1. To be a "powerful" Tyrant
who can spiritually 'zap' anyone
into unawareness or inactivity or
into doing what she wants.
That is, she is too cowardly to be decent
(this is her 'going to' Richard Reiss
and definitely her running away from Koos).
2. To neither find anything wrong
with her own evil side,
nor with the evil side of others, and
to remain in a sort of cloudy state
of, by consequence, having no responsibility
for what she does in the physical universe
to others or for what others do to her or to others.
That is, she is too cowardly to take any survival action
or to evaluate any action of self or others towards survival.
This is too cowardly to live.
It is near suicide.
This is her present state (21 December 1997).
(This is her 'going to' L. Ron Hubbard
and his "Serenity" attitude.)
But she still has an unbelievably ugly, unbelievably evil,
hidden game going on right now,
which is underlying this,
as you will see further below.]
[Jutta:]
"When I am running away from Koos,
I am running away from where there is
a huge agreement on contribution
(on giving and receiving contribution)
and
a huge agreement on creating survival LFBD
and
a huge agreement that there CAN be and SHOULD be survival."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"For refusing to face any evil intentions
[because they remind me of my own evil intentions,
and they force me
to either control my own evil intentions,
or to decide to follow my own evil intentions completely,
as I do not want to admit
that I mostly do operate by making others
less aware or less active
and want to punish them with spiritual force
unless they do what I want them to do or not do
(and that is WITHOUT looking at what they want and need).
(Note by Koos)].
"FOR REFUSING TO STAY STABLE when there is any
- pressure,
- 'make wrong',
- invalidating,
- intention to kick me out of spaces. LFBDBD
"'To run away' would make me right
for considering that
'SOMEWHERE THERE IS A PLACE
where all this pressure, invalidating, kicking out
does not exist.'
"Oh yeah?
"That must be the 'Serenity' space [viewpoint]! LFBD
[L. Ron Hubbard's
(most cowardly, viciously and arrogantly
"being above" all aliveness
and "being above" all desires to defend life and decency
and "being above" and "greater than" all people
who DO defend aliveness and decency,
AND accusing and blaming and lying about people
who DO try to be decent and alive and caring for others)
his "Serenity"-doctrine
of
"You are and feel 'Invulnerable' and 'Great' and 'All is fine',
when you DON'T create aliveness and
when you DON'T protect your own life nor the life of others
AND when you demand to be admired by others
for your state of 'Being Senior to Life'."
He is just a complete COWARD,
but represents it as "Being above life"!
Jutta is suffering very heavily and frequently
from attacks of this particular mental disease
in which one
does not "need to face life nor opposition to life",
but where one is - in one's own imagination, that is -
"invulnerable", and in fact destroys all life.
This "Serenity"-doctrine is described in
RI-847i 'Diana Ross: The Poison of Admiration' of 30 Apr 1997
(http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-847i.htm)
and in many other RI-Bulletins
(http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/search.html).]
[Jutta:]
"Where there is a strong agreement on
'NO disagreement allowed here'
[which is complete APATHY and total COWARDICE,
and calling it making everybody feel great,
but it is EXTREMELY UGLY, AND VERY DEAD].
LFBD's-F/Nind [= a truth found out]
"'Serenity'-'think':
'No disagreement allowed here.'
'We must always work towards agreement!'
'Disagreement does NOT bring about survival.'
"Now, I [happen to] know
it DOES bring about survival to disagree
[to disagree with someone's destruction and treachery and lies]!"
F/Nind
[Koos:] This is not a Floating (E-meter-)Needle(***) that indicates
'Release of Charge completed'.
This, instead, is an A-R-C-Break F/N
(which occurs when one disconnects from a part of life).
[Your mentally] 'running away' as the "result" for the Session,
is not the E.P. [the End Phenomenon, Good Result]
of the Process [of the Questions used in the Session].
Your "I found an explanation [for my condition]"
is NOT the E.P. [not a Good Result].
[Solo-Auditor:] Assessment of the A-R-C-Break
[about the false 'Serenity'-doctrine that]
'Disagreement does not [would not] bring about survival':
[Jutta:]
"I was recently, when I did this with a Suppressive Person
[whom I met and whom I did decide NOT to disagree with]:
Was it a Break in my
Affinity? sF IND[icated to myself]
Reality? sF IND
Communication? F IND
Understanding? LF IND
It was
inhibited Understanding sF IND
enforced Affinity sF IND LFBD
enforced Reality sF IND
enforced Communication sF IND
[Koos:] The A-R-C-Break [upset] is
"running away from the Session
with the excuse of having a Cognition [a realization]."
[Jutta:]
Was it a Break in my
Affinity? sF IND
Reality? sF IND
Communication? F IND
Understanding? sF F LFBD IND
It was
inhibited Understanding F IND
[Jutta:]
"Inhibited Understanding of the Item 'To run away'
[to run away into a fixed coward-state
of L. Ron Hubbard's 'Serenity']."
It was
refused Affinity F IND
[Jutta:]
"Refused Affinity for the Item."
[Refusing to stay with the subject and look at it. (Note by Koos)]
It was
no Reality sF IND
[Jutta:]
"No Reality about the Item."
It was
refused Communication F IND
[Jutta:]
"Refused Communication with the Item." LFBD
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"For my refusing to contribute to life.
"For my HAVING run away many times from Koos, this lifetime.
[I just do it again - that shows
how right the earlier times were!]
"For having destroyed myself-as-a-spirit, in 1788
[at my retirement in my lifetime as Benjamin Franklin]. LFBDBD
"It makes me right
for REFUSING TO KNOW ABOUT THE PROBLEMS
OTHERS HAVE REGARDING SURVIVING. LFBD
"It makes me right
for refusing to duplicate their Reality.
"It makes me right
for refusing to help them
when they have adopted evil [destructive of life] intentions LFBD
as [fixed, safe] solutions to survival. F's
"It [running away from life] would make me right LFBD
for wanting to destroy people
by LEAVING them in the grip [compulsion]
of their evil intentions." F's
[Note by Koos:
This is very basically the evil compulsion of Jutta:
To destroy others by keeping them
destroying each other's
awareness, decency and aliveness, and
pushing them into it further.
This is due to her entirely false concept of 'being good'.
She wants to make herself believe and
others want to make her believe, that
the more evil others are,
the better she is by comparison.
That's why she WANTS to let others be evil to each other!
I told you the definition of 'being good':
It is creating survival.
Nothing whatsoever to do with
how good or evil others are,
or how good or evil one was in the past.
Nothing to do with it at all!
This is a very strong evil intention of Jutta,
as described in
the Resolving Domination Series (RDS-series)
with her session of 12 August 1997, 07:17 GMT,
in which she describes how she treats a criminal.]
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"It would make me right
for deserting my friend, Koos,
and
it would make me right
for continuing to destroy what Koos had built up.
"It would make me right
[for] having ruined Koos' credit standing
while I was Blown [had run away irresponsibly],
and
Koos found me only a few months later [in Trier, Germany,
showing my paintings in the street, being 'on the run',
hiding from life, destroying life]."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"For REFUSING to confront what IS there.
"'I don't HAVE to face it,
I just can go somewhere else
where the conditions are different.'
"(I did this
when I refused to confront the evil intentions
of (a person next to whom we were living).)" LFBD
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"I am duplicating LFBD
Koos' stability with which he confronts what is there. LFBD
"I am duplicating
how Koos makes it possible for Noel and Freya to be here. LFBD
"I [faintly] am contributing to Koos now:
By [faintly] having my own viewpoint about Koos and
about Koos' survival intentions,
by [faintly] seeing Koos' good intentions,
by [faintly] disagreeing with those who want to destroy Koos and
who want to kick him out. F LFBD
"I [faintly] disagree with Koos' father LFBDBD
and
I [faintly] disagree WITH MYSELF
[with my own intentions to destroy Koos' viewpoint],
that's why I CONTINUE the Session [now,
instead of ending it by mentally 'running away']."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"For refusing to ADMIT
that I do NOT WANT to create any future -
for Koos, for Freya, for Noel, for myself." LF
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right? LFBD
[Jutta:]
"For REFUSING to let another
look at me and at my evil intentions.
"For wanting to survive
without me looking at another's evil intentions.
"'When I have run away, I can
create myself as I want, LFBD
give myself any [false] image I want'."
[Note by Koos:
Criminals do all these things,
All criminals are cowards.
L. Ron Hubbard does precisely and exactly the same
- with precisely the same intentions.]
All criminals are also psychopaths and vicious liars,
who in order to create themselves
with an image of 'being good, great, responsible, etc.',
destroy, without any conscience whatsoever,
the truth about people
who ACTUALLY are being good, great and responsible.]
(see also RI-980i 'Character of any heavy Suppressive - Jutta...'
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-980i.htm)
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"'When I am [running away to] somewhere
WHERE NOBODY KNOWS ME
[hiding from friends and acquaintances],
it is an attempt
[to DENY my crimes against life, which is also, technically, called:]
to 'Not-Is' my 'Overts' [my Anti-Survival Acts].'
"I RUN AWAY from myself:
I have created financial problems of magnitude [large in size].
To RUN AWAY from
looking at the conditions now,
is supposed to make me right:
'I never wanted to have financial problems.'
"So I am [actually] very wrong now and not right at all,
as I HAVE financial problems. LFBD
"IT IS CRAZY WHAT I AM DOING.
"I just could, and do now to some extent,
'settle down' and NOT 'run away' but
LOOK at the financial conditions.
"The financial conditions ARE there.
"Running away
doesn't change [anything even] a [little] bit, but
makes it worse, and
leaves all the problems to Koos, LF
dumps all on him."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right? LF
[Jutta:]
"The thought
'I have no right to be here [with Koos] because
I have been so evil!'
is a JUSTIFICATION for running away, LFBD
and doesn't contribute the least bit to repairing anything.
[Note by Koos:
Again, the definition of 'being good' IS
to create survival.
So one INSTANTLY can 'be good',
regardless of how evil one has been earlier.]
[Jutta:]
"[I better say]
'I have created a lot of havoc,
I am here now to repair what I have done!' - THAT is helping.
"Running away doesn't help,
I HAVE done what I have done. LFBD
"I do not want to make it less now by discussing that
'I never wanted to' - because
WHEN I DID IT, I DID WANT TO [be evil and destructive]."
[Note by Koos:
Please, all psychologists and criminologists, hear!]
[Koos to Jutta:]
The truth is [also] that
you have done some repair, something good, and
THEN you say
"you have the RIGHT to run away."
After a sale when the conditions are good
and things are going fine and are affluent
and we are enjoying life,
you say [think secretly and act out]:
"I have been good,
now I have the RIGHT to run away."
[Note by Koos:
Again due to her false definition of 'being good'.
A good part of Jutta's black magic 'zapping' consists of
enforcing on others pictures and feelings
of times she WAS good,
in order that they do NOT see
that NOW she is entirely destructive
and entirely evil and insane to them.
And she runs and stays away
to leave you with the memory of her 'being good',
while she is NOW doing nothing but
'zapping' you, and others, and herself
into unawareness and false awareness and
into stopping others' and her own aliveness.
L. Ron Hubbard does precisely the same,
even with huge PR-campaigns.]
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Now, below, we get some right answers! (Note by Koos)]
[Jutta:]
"It DOESN'T make me right
for not caring for Koos and Freya and Noel!
"If I run away,
AS I run away - because that's what I am doing -
I try to 'Not-Is' [deny] LFBD
that I DO want to have money. LFBD
"I make MYSELF dull and dumb and half unconscious
in order NOT to admit to myself
that I DO want to have money. LF
"I try to 'Not-Is' [DENY] that I HAVE a thirst for life: LF
- that I DO want friends visiting us,
- that I DO want to travel with Koos and Freya and Noel,
- that I DO want to have possessions,
- that I DO want to have a beautiful house, LFBD
- that I DO want to buy things for Koos and Freya and Noel.
"I am doing something very insane with my desire to have [things in life]:
I destroyed my desire to have [things in life], in 1788
[at my retirement during my lifetime as Benjamin Franklin].
"And in 1810 [during my lifetime as Marie Louise of Austria
when I married Napoleon]:
'I shouldn't have anything [that] I MYSELF want to have,
I should be satisfied [with] what I get (what I am given
by the Suppressive Person Napoleon Bonaparte)'." LFBD
[Note by Koos:
This is Jutta's very, very insane and extremely ugly game
that she mainly has with the being Richard Reiss:
To INTENTIONALLY destroy herself
so that she will NOT CARE
FOR THE SANITY OF OTHERS,
especially not of others who would
'NEVER, EVER DESERVE TO BE HELPED',
like Richard Reiss or Napoleon Bonaparte.
Especially not care for the
extremely insane, extremely ugly being Richard Reiss
- because she wants rather
to PUNISH him
for being so extremely insane and
so extremely destructive of others,
punish him by ENCOURAGING HIM TO BE MORE EVIL,
instead of stopping his evil,
because that would be helping him,
and NOT punishing him.
In order to let HIM destroy her:
"He deserves to do it anyway,
AND he does it best!
And it punishes HIM at the same time
by making HIM more evil."
"So there is no better solution
than to ask Richard Reiss to destroy me.
He willingly complies
AND it makes him more insane as well."
Do you get the idea,
now, of this kind of punishment
that ONLY creates more and more and more evil?
This idea is also propagated by L. Ron Hubbard
who classifies people in
those who 'deserve to be helped' and
those who 'do not deserve to be helped'.
He does not even know what help IS.
And he also promotes the idea that
'life is a game of overwhelming'!
Really!
(see RI-732i 'The Evil in Hubbard's Scientology Philosophy' 10 Nov 96
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-732i.htm)
YOU HAVE TO RISE ABOVE THE IDEA OF
'NOT DESERVING' AND OF 'PUNISHMENT',
AND GET USED TO THE IDEA, IN ALL SITUATIONS,
THAT 'GOOD' IS CREATING SURVIVAL
AND
THAT DESTROYING SURVIVAL IS EVIL.
On top of this,
Jutta ALSO has the game
of 'being entirely without bother
by the being Richard Reiss'
- NOT by helping him to stop,
BUT by destroying him till utter extinction
- which cannot happen to a spirit -
AND by making herself so completely unaware and extinct
that she cannot notice Richard Reiss.
And that's what she did then, in 1790 in the Implant station:
WANTING TO BE HELPED TO DECIDE,
WANTING TO HAVE A 'GOOD REASON GIVEN TO HER'
TO MAKE HERSELF ENTIRELY UNAWARE 'FOREVER'.
You see, she could blame the Implanters and their machines for that:
"It wasn't her own decision,
she could and did loudly claim, now:
She was forced 'by them' to incapacitate herself."
("THEY ruined her capability
to help others, her care for Mankind."
Jutta kept up this lie till this summer,
when she started to admit
that two years before her death, in 1788,
she HAD already decided
to not care for people anymore.)
(see RI-941i 'Benjamin Franklin's fatal decision of 1788' 24 Oct 97
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-941i.htm)
Jutta's "forever"-decisions nowadays
don't take longer than a few months,
or sometimes a few weeks.
Then, in 1790, she appeared again shortly afterwards
on Earth, smelling the grass,
'not knowing' anything of her past or of her decisions.
And shortly thereafter
the crying of baby Marie-Louise of Austria was heard
- NOT far away from Metternich,
who is now the being Richard Reiss.
And indeed, she AGAIN REFUSED to say "No!"
to his evil and degrading,
most significantly when he demanded
that she marry
the most vicious, evil, ugly and destructive Napoleon Bonaparte,
the only one Marie-Louise NEVER would want to have as a husband.
But RICHARD REISS
DID NOT "DESERVE" TO BE STOPPED BY HER,
DID NOT "DESERVE" TO BE MADE LESS EVIL BY HER.
Do you understand the idea now,
of 'not deserving', of 'punishing',
and what consequences it has in REAL life?
Because Metternich was
"too evil and too ugly
to deserve to be stopped in his evil",
Marie-Louise made herself
ugly, indecent and
entirely without responsibility
for the evil of Napoleon which she very well saw,
and made herself 'enjoy' sex with him.
And in the process,
she let her only son with Napoleon destroy himself.
(see RI-559Ri 'Napoleon and Metternich - Two Suppressives' 11 May 96
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-559ri.htm)
These are the real facts of life,
things that are being done ALL THE TIME
by many people.]
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"'Right' for not owning anything LFBD
[with a very real, strong intention to deny
herself and others any possessions or joy of them. (Note by Koos)]
"For destroying even what I got by heritage [inheritance]
(two pieces of land,
which altogether were worth one million Deutsch Mark [US $600K]).
"But
I could NOT even 'have'
[take responsibility for owning and caring for]
that potential possession:
I [really, intentionally, evilly]
REFUSED to turn it wisely into something survival
for my family and for our activity." LFBD
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"It would make me right for having NOTHING: LF
I [intentionally] have nothing.
I [intentionally] own practically nothing:
A few clothes, crayons
- my paintings belong to Koos.
[Jutta ran away, on 17 October,
in the clothes and jacket of her daughter, and
without a purse, without money,
without a watch, without anything.
And so she must have decided
to 'be the great dominating tyrant'
and stole a wallet of someone
and got out of town
and kept hiding from everyone.
Very, very ugly.
Intentionally criminal,
intentionally unaware of her decent impulses.]
[Jutta:]
"And why is all that [having nothing]?
I REFUSE to be responsible for the house and for what's in it,
so I say
'I don't own it'.
I REFUSE to be responsible for Koos' work,
so I say
'I don't own the computers and the telephones'. LFBD
"I would own two cars -
which need repair and a new one needs to be bought -
I would own them,
IF I said I want to be responsible for it.
"BUT I - WANT TO - RUN AWAY.
[Note by Koos:
That is, she wants to enforce
how right it is NOT TO HELP PEOPLE
"because they should HAVE no problems."
They should create life FOR her,
so she can be a dominating tyrant and feel "great."]
[Jutta:]
"What IS needed [for survival, for having possessions]?
"Finding people in the society who like to buy my paintings!
"That would reduce my problems to zero!" LFBDBD
[Note by Koos:
That's of course a total nonsense-statement from Jutta.
She intentionally refuses to go to people
who do, very much, like to buy her paintings -
IN ORDER THAT SHE WILL NOT HAVE MONEY OR POSSESSIONS, and
in order not to look at her own evil,
and because she does NOT WANT to help people,
and she says "People don't buy art."]
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make others wrong?
[Jutta:]
"With my running away,
I ACCUSE others of
wanting to have beautiful things,
wanting to have practical things,
wanting to have things in working order,
wanting to buy new things and pay old bills,
wanting to enjoy life,
wanting to meet other people,
wanting to work with excellent equipment.
"I make Koos, Freya and Noel WRONG
for wanting to have
things which I COMPULSIVELY deny myself." LFBDBD
[Note by Koos:
A few hours before she ran away (again) on 17 October 1997,
I was in another town buying myself some loudspeakers.
Jutta gave me a JOLT of spiritual energy,
thrown at me by her,
of how "evil" I was
for enjoying to have some proper loudspeakers for my music.
I phoned her on my son's cellular phone
- he was with her in town -
that she was being pushed down by Richard Reiss, and
that she better keep her own viewpoint.
But she had ALREADY - secretly, of course,
that's how tremendously a big coward she is -
decided
to "live", to run away, to hide,
to 'be with Richard Reiss',
to forget all her decency,
to steal someone's wallet
so she could buy a train ticket, and
to be 'great' and 'destroy all signs of' her family and friends
by staying away from them totally,
and now 'having things' ONLY by being criminal.
This lasted one and a half month,
and then she settled down
into ugly, apathetic cowardice
and still a lot of spiritual 'zapping' at us
for us still existing and thereby reminding her
how criminal and insane she wants to be and is now, and
for us continuing to look at her and find out
the real truth about her insanity so as to make it vanish.]
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make others wrong?
[Jutta:]
"It would make Koos wrong
for confronting the evil intentions of others:
Those of his father,
those of his mother,
those of the rest of his family -
where most of the members of Koos' family
agree NOT to see it and to
run away from [looking at] it, and
call it [this refusal to look at each other]
'being friends to each other'.
So they are ruining each other
[by not helping each other and
by pretending that evil is not evil]."
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"For using my [mental, spiritual] force FOR RUNNING AWAY.
"For using my spiritual force
[to make others UNAWARE],
to escape [from facing life]
AND
to help others escape [from facing life, as well]." LFBD
[Instead of - exactly same action, generating spiritual force, but -
directed to make them AWARE!]
[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away"
make you right?
[Jutta:]
"If I am running away,
I could PRETEND to myself that
'I HAVE good intentions towards our survival,
only "I can't execute them" because
the counter-force [of others against me] is too strong'.
[Note by Koos:
While in fact she gets
tremendous, tremendous SUPPORT,
not counter-force, but SUPPORT almost 24 hours a day,
from her husband AND children,
who create almost all life, and things to work with,
and keep it in order,
and handle the havoc she continuously creates by herself,
FOR HER.
It is NOT counter-force of others, at all!
It is solely and only her OWN intention:
Very forcefully to destroy and oppose life,
including her own life,
by creating spiritual energy
to KEEP OR BASH AWARENESS DOWN,
to KEEP OR BASH DOWN INTENTIONS TO BE ALIVE AND ENJOY LIFE.
In us, in others, in herself.
Very, very insane, very, very psychopathic,
(as does Richard Reiss, as well, to himself and to others).
SHE creates tremendous counter-force,
and WE are, indeed, subjected to it.
(We will see her hidden, very ugly, unbelievably insane
game underlying it, in the next RI-Bulletin.)
But, criminal as she is,
she would and does not refrain
from blaming us and others
for 'causing her counter-intention',
for 'us not caring ENOUGH for her'.
She terrorizes us and our lives
almost 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
but we 'did not help her enough to face Richard Reiss'
and we were so evil to her
as to not prevent her from running away
- when SHE forced her son not to look at her for two minutes.
How evil of us!]
[Jutta:]
"But if I AM facing counter-force [of suppressive intentions],
I might sometimes be successful
in changing something for the better,
sometimes I might mess it up
by my own evil intentions.
"To run away AFTER I had done something good, LFBDBD
SHOULD prevent me LFBDBD
from messing things up again. LFBD
"[But] that never worked."
LFBD-F/Nind [= a truth established]
'Jutta Nolst Trenite'
Total session time: 4 hrs 38 min
As Jutta wrote,
her "I do not want to mess things up again"
is her JUSTIFICATION for running away,
to make it SEEM somewhat 'righter'
to be evil and destructive and
to be a complete coward
who does not dare to face her own evil.
The truth is
that she simply wants to
be evil, criminal, destructive to herself and others,
and
leave the impression with others
of how good she WAS.
It has all nothing whatsoever
to do with BEING good or BEING bad,
but only with what good opinion
she can manage to 'black magic'
onto others, and onto herself.
NO INTEREST TO ACTUALLY
MAKE THINGS GOOD
AND KEEP THEM RUNNING WELL.
It is all a personal game of others or herself
'having a good opinion of her'.
And that's her only, but extremely false definition
of 'being good' that she wants to work with.
Note that L. Ron Hubbard did precisely and exactly the same,
first after he had achieved his goal of Clearing, in 1965,
then in 1982,
and then, by suicide, in 1986.
(see also RI-288i 'The Main Evil Purpose' of 15 Oct 1995
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-288i.htm)
The "reasons" and motives and justifications of L. Ron Hubbard
are precisely and exactly the same as those of Jutta.
Both have false definitions of
'being good' and 'being evil'.
Both solve it by driving themselves
into UNAWARENESS AND COWARDICE,
and calling that
'being better than others'
or 'being above life',
in order to have a good opinion of themselves.
And they demand of others
to also see it that way.
I never did, and I never will.
That's why I am me,
always was me, and
always will be me.
Motto of the 'Resolving Domination Series' (RDS):
"Koos is giving much more life than all other beings I know.
I want to be in communication with Koos."
(Jutta's own viewpoint in 1977 for joining Koos)
Footnote:
See the 'Understanding Suppression Series', at
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/usp.htm
* (see RI-541i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - I' 20 Apr 1996
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-541i.htm
and following parts II, III, IV)
** [Definition of 'Solo-Auditor':
Someone who writes down his own confession
in response to given questions,
with the purpose to release emotional charge and aberrations.]
*** (The abbreviations sF(small Fall), F(Fall), LF(Long Fall), LFBD(Long
Fall Blow Down) and F/N(Floating Needle) describe reactions on the
E-meter, indicating mental charge (sF, F, LF, LFBD), and release of
charge completed (F/N).
"LFBD-F/N" = truth found out. "ind" = indicated to the person.)
(see RI-610i 'Understanding the E-meter, correctly' of 26 June 1996
RI-648i 'Simplicity of E-meter use, by UNDERSTANDING it' 1 Aug 96
RI-687i 'Notes on E-meter use and Solo-Auditing' of 4 Sept 1996
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-687i.htm)
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind
Copyright 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite
Editors: Freya Nolst Trenite and Blair Wiley
Final Editor: Koos Nolst Trenite
Supervision and publication requested by Jutta Nolst Trenite
Actions and Publication ordered by Ambassador for Mankind
Personal Web-page:
http://ArtOrg.com
Personal Web-Library:
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/
Library Search Engine:
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/search.html
References (available also at the Library "http://Art-Org.com/"):
- About Sanity, Care, Understanding and Responsibility
RI-449i 'A Rule For Freedom' of 14 Jan 1996
RI-714i 'State of Sanity, Definition of' of 24 Oct 1996
RI-537i 'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996
RI-929i 'Simple Detection: "Sane or Insane?"' of 11 Sept 1997
RI-962i 'The Master Path to Life - Platonism understood' of 1 Nov 97
RI-974i 'Truth about "Not putting attention on evil of others"' 27 Nov 97
RI-908i 'The Ostrich-factor - on facing evil or criminality' 16 Jul 97
RI-781BPI 'Raising Children - or Keeping Them Small?' of 16 Jan 1997
RI-631i 'Definition of "Woman"' of 12 July 1996
RI-629i 'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
- About Richard Reiss
RI-900i 'The Spiritual Killer Reiss (FLAG - "Church of Scientology")'
RI-890i 'Flag's Richard Reiss - Why to remove him' of 4 Aug 96
RI-891i 'Flag's Richard Reiss - his intention to hide from Koos' 11 Aug 96
RI-892i 'Flag's Reiss - million times worse than Adolf Hitler' 19 June 97
RI-893i 'FLAG's Reiss - How he dominated a planetary population' 20 June 97
RI-889i 'Richard Reiss is "Safe" at Flag (in Florida)' of 17 June 1997
RI-889i-A 'More Black Scientology of Richard Reiss' of 18 June 1997
RI-746i 'Biggest Present Enemy of Mankind - Richard Reiss' of 26 Nov 96
RI-745i 'FLAG and Richard Reiss equals Black Scientology' of 14 Sept 96
RI-792i 'Destroying destroyer Reiss of Flag is MORE destruction' 16 Feb 97
RI-780i 'Removing FLAG's Richard Reiss the wrong way' of 12 Jan 1997
RI-761i 'Slaves of FLAG's Richard Reiss - VERY IMPORTANT' of 26 Nov 1996
RI-757i 'Making a violent psychotic saner' of 11 Dec 1996
RI-754i 'Bitter truth about L. Ron Hubbard and Richard Reiss' 4 Dec 96
(and many more)
- About Benjamin Franklin
RI-941i 'Benjamin Franklin's fatal decision of 1788' of 24 Oct 1997
RI-133i 'Benjamin Franklin's right to NOT be' of 31 Mar 1995
RI-647i 'Benjamin Franklin returning from France - Part I' of 30 July 1996
RI-656i 'Benjamin Franklin returning from France - Part II' of 30 July 96
RI-674i 'Benjamin Franklin returning from France - Part III' of 30 July 96
- About Jutta
RI-983i 'Jutta Blackmailed for Eternity by Reiss, Also on Christmas?'
RI-982Pi 'Wanting To Be Punished In Order Not To Face Own Acts (Jutta)'
RI-981i 'Jutta RUNNING AWAY - from facing Reiss driving her insane'
RI-980i 'Character of any heavy Suppressive Person - Jutta seen by Freya'
RI-979i 'Deserting Their Own Hero - Why (Jutta, Michael Jackson, etc.) Do'
RI-978i 'The Wall of Shame - Remedy of Hell, Jutta, Socrates, Black Magic'
RI-976Di 'Psychose - am Beispiel der Malerin Jutta - ins Auge gefasst'
RI-972i 'Jutta: "How I want to destroy LIFE, since 1788"' of 4 Sept 1997
RI-972Si 'Hidden but Executed Intentions of the paintress Jutta' 23 Nov 97
RI-969i 'Jutta: "See me Great, or I kill you" - The main evil' 3 Sept 97
RI-967i 'Jutta: "Communicating with Koos is knowing myself"' of 26 Aug 97
RI-966i 'Jutta: "Being Unaware is NOT 'Keeping my Viewpoint Clean'"'
RI-964i 'Jutta: With Koos, care for people - Without Koos, dominating...'
RI-961i 'Jutta: "I am praised for helping Mankind, but now destroying it"'
RI-960i 'Jutta: Why I destroyed Koos' Castle Project (1980) - Domination'
RI-959i 'Jutta: "I just don't WANT to handle L. Ron Hubbard's insanity"'
(and more)
- About RI-Bulletins
RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996
These references and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or
at the Library of Koos' writings on
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/usp.htm
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/telepathy.htm
or at the Archives at
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI/USP
Back to the RI-Bulletin index.