10 April 1994
Added to and issued 24 Feb 97
USP-051 'Fighting any attempts to really help him'
Understanding Suppression Series # 51
(See Footnote for understanding)
One of many definitions of 'Suppressive Person':
Someone who will do ANYTHING and will exert great mental force to
try and destroy that person or action that will actually return him
to sanity.
Any step done towards the direction of actually making the
Suppressive Person saner, or less insane - even if it is a very little
step and even if the person helping does it naturally without knowing
that he has a Suppressive Person in front of him - any such step is
seen as and experienced by the Suppressive Person as 'an action of
taking away his self-determinism, his belief in himself or his honor',
and it actually seems to him that 'you make an attempt to - at least
spiritually - murder him'.
That he experiences actual, true help in that way, '"of course"
requires drastic measures and actions of "self-defense"' from the
Suppressive Person. And so he will actually try to destroy the
person who really, truly helps him.
When the Suppressive Person is then asked about his attempts to
destroy a helpful person, he will try not to be aware of what he
really did, and he sees his mean behavior and his lies more like
self-defense.
The Suppressive Person will very convincingly maintain that it was
the responsible, sane and helpful person who was actually doing
something to destroy HIM. He will categorically - if he can get away
with it - deny the truth that he himself IS the one who wanted and
wants the destruction of himself and of others.
The Suppressive Person is "right" of course, he IS being "destroyed"
by any survival act towards him or by any survival act that affects him.
That is: His EVIL is being destroyed by survival acts.
When the EVIL of a Suppressive Person is destroyed by survival acts,
what remains is the being himself - who is allowed to be himself and
whose evil is stopped, or who is prevented from being compulsively evil.
However, the enormous MENTAL FORCE that a Suppressive Person puts out
to convince others that 'anyone who helps him to be less evil is
"extremely evil" and "has committed horrible crimes against him"',
this OUTPUT OF MENTAL ENERGY can be SO FORCEFUL that almost any
"impartial", "well-meaning", "helpful" judge - or a friend asked to
judge a dispute (for instance between married partners of whom one
is a Suppressive Person) can be completely misled into making VERY
false judgements.
I will go into that much more precisely later in these 'Understanding
Suppression Series', and have already written about it in the earlier
issues of this Series.
In this society, there is an enormous agreement not to look at, or,
in legal courts or other disciplinary procedures, to disregard the
actual MENTAL FORCE OF INTENTION exerted by a suppressive party or by
suppressive people who want to destroy those who are decent and helpful.
To determine this intention and to assess the force of it, is the
basis of real Ethics: "Is the person's force of intention towards
general survival, or is his force of intention towards general
destruction, and how strong then is that force?"
A show of 'impartiality' and 'not being biased' is mostly - if not
always - a social lie to try to enforce ideas like: "You must NOT
look at the intentions of the parties involved, otherwise you are not
'impartial'", "You must 'only look at facts', and 'intentions are not
facts'."
These are all utterances of actual Suppressive Persons, with the sole
purpose to keep their own intentions (which have as a result their
actions) hidden. And to protect other Suppressive Persons: If you are
not allowed to look at and judge other Suppressive Persons correctly,
then they themselves are also "safe", you see.
The point is that you either LOOK at intentions or you DON'T LOOK at
intentions.
When you DO look at intentions, you then can make the ethical decision
you are asked to make.
It requires an involvement: THE INVOLVEMENT TO BE ETHICAL AND TO
WANT TO DECIDE FOR THE BEST SURVIVAL OF THE PERSON(S) YOU ARE JUDGING.
When you don't look at intentions, you are a traitor - a traitor
to life, a traitor to the parties under judgement, and a traitor
to yourself.
King Solomon, in his famous judgement, tested the INTENTION of both
the women who claimed the ownership of the same baby.
He said "I will give each of you half of its body".
To this, the woman with destructive intentions agreed.
But the woman with survival intentions refused to accept the judgement.
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind
Copyright 1994, 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite
Personal Web-page: http://ArtOrg.com
Personal Web-Library: http://Art-Org.com
Footnote:
You can't have or maintain good without understanding evil.
NONE of the present sciences, therapies and religions, and
none of the "-isms" or "-ologies" of today understand evil
or suppression.
Yet they have abundant - and sometimes very expensive -
recipes for "being good forever". Even when they claim to
understand evil, they want to be unaware of and hide their
own evil and so they become evil themselves, and they meet
evil with evil in order "to defend themselves or their group".
It is not possible to handle properly someone who is evil or
something that is evil WITHOUT understanding WHAT PRECISELY
you are handling.
YOU CAN'T HANDLE AN EVIL BEING, FOR INSTANCE, UNLESS YOU
UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE HANDLING A BEING, AND THAT YOU ARE
HELPING HIM - A BEING - TO CONTROL HIS EVIL.
The Understanding Suppression Series will help you - maybe
for the first time - to understand evil well enough in order
to maintain good. I have taken care to write as easy to
understand as possible. The Series starts out very simple,
and currently consists of about 150 separate observations.
Keeping this knowledge to yourself will not maintain good
- because others, lacking understanding of evil, will
unintentionally assist evil - but you sharing this knowledge
with others WILL make you win over evil, and WILL safeguard
good.
Koos Nolst Trenite

Back to the index.